Scott Schutza v. Courtesy Chevrolet Center

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

                                                                            FILED
                           NOT FOR PUBLICATION
                                                                             JUL 10 2017
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                          U.S. COURT OF APPEALS


                           FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SCOTT SCHUTZA,                                   No. 15-55631

              Plaintiff-Appellant,               D.C. No.
                                                 3:14-cv-02576-BAS-DHB
 v.

COURTESY CHEVROLET CENTER, a                     MEMORANDUM*
California Corporation,

              Defendant-Appellee.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of California
                   Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding

                           Submitted February 6, 2017**
                              Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

      We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for

reconsideration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No.

15-55633.

      VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff.

      *
        This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
      **
        The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
                                                                          FILED
Schutza v. Courtesy Chevrolet Ctr., No. 15-55631
                                                                           JUL 10 2017
BYBEE, Circuit Judge, acquiescing dubitante:                           MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                        U.S. COURT OF APPEALS


      I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in

Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633.