Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Charles Ratledge

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-7355 FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHARLES RATLEDGE; MARK HORNAK; DAVID HICTON; ROBERT CESSAR; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:16-hc-02219-D) Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, as well as its order denying Banks’ self-styled motion to vacate that order and judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Banks v. Ratledge, No. 5:16-hc-02219-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2017 & Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2