MEMORANDUM DECISION
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED
this Memorandum Decision shall not be May 04 2018, 10:17 am
regarded as precedent or cited before any
CLERK
court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals
the defense of res judicata, collateral and Tax Court
estoppel, or the law of the case.
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Cara Schaefer Wieneke Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
Wieneke Law Office, LLC Attorney General of Indiana
Brooklyn, Indiana
Matthew B. Mackenzie
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Phillip Evans, May 4, 2018
Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.
84A01-1709-CR-2116
v. Appeal from the Vigo Superior
Court
State of Indiana, The Honorable Michael J. Lewis,
Appellee-Plaintiff. Judge
Trial Court Cause No.
84D06-1401-MR-51
Barnes, Judge.
Case Summary
[1] Phillip A. Evans appeals his sixty-year sentence for murder. We affirm.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 84A01-1709-CR-2116 | May 4, 2018 Page 1 of 7
Issue
[2] The sole issue before us is whether Evans’s sentence is inappropriate in light of
the nature of the offense and his character.
Facts
[3] Pamela Jones and her boyfriend, Devlin Decker, planned to host a party in
Terre Haute on December 31, 2013. That evening, they picked up Decker’s
uncle, Evans, and his roommate, Joshua Thomas. They stopped briefly at a gas
station so Evans could withdraw money from an ATM. Evans returned to the
car and angrily accused Thomas, whom he had earlier allowed access to his
bank card, of withdrawing money from his account. Thomas denied doing so.
They all returned to Jones’s home and drank until they were intoxicated.
[4] Later, Thomas began to flirt with Jones. Decker and Thomas argued and
began to fight. The fight spilled outside. Evans, who was still angry with
Thomas, followed Decker and Thomas outside. Evans watched as Decker
kicked and punched Thomas repeatedly. Jones’s next door neighbors, Eric and
Diana Goucher, heard the commotion, looked outside, and saw Thomas with
“his hands up . . . saying I’m sorry, please stop[.]” Tr. p. 179. Decker knocked
Thomas off the porch onto the concrete surface below. When Thomas rose to
his hands and knees, Decker lifted a wooden table weighing approximately fifty
pounds and slammed it down onto his head. Decker then walked back into
Jones’s house. When Thomas attempted to re-enter the house, Evans pinned
him against the house, “kind of looked around and took a step back and hit
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 84A01-1709-CR-2116 | May 4, 2018 Page 2 of 7
him.” Id. at 26. Thomas’s body went limp and “fell onto [Evans].” Id. at 27.
Both men crashed off the porch with Evans landing on top of Thomas. The
noise brought Decker running from the house; he jumped off the porch, and
“started to stomp [Thomas] in the head and Phillip Evans started to kick
[Thomas] in the side.” Id. at 29. Thomas was unconscious.
[5] Diana Goucher dialed 911 “telling them they need[ed] to hurry up cause
[Decker and Evans were] gonna hurt [Thomas] bad.” Id. at 181. “[T]hey were
kicking him so hard that, in the head and stuff [that she] looked away at one
point.” Id. Decker and Evans stopped their attack on Thomas when they “saw
[the Gouchers] looking out the window” at them. Id. Decker enlisted a newly-
arrived party guest, Camron Wormser, to help him move Thomas. As
Wormser helped drag Thomas, Decker resumed kicking Thomas’s head.
[6] Officers of the Terre Haute Police Department arrived at the scene. Decker ran
into Jones’s house in a panic and told her that he had stabbed Thomas. Soon
thereafter, Evans came into the house and told Jones and Wormser’s girlfriend,
Courtney Dailey, that he too had stabbed Thomas. Medical responders
transported Thomas to the hospital, where he died. An autopsy revealed
multiple abrasions to his head and torso as well as three stab wounds, one of
which had perforated his heart, killing him.
[7] Evans told Detective Darren Long of the Terre Haute City Police Department
that he had called 911; that four members of the Aryan Brotherhood had
attacked Thomas; and that they had knocked Evans unconscious when he tried
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 84A01-1709-CR-2116 | May 4, 2018 Page 3 of 7
to render aid. The Gouchers contradicted Evans’s account and advised that
Evans was “not a witness” but a participant in the attack on Thomas. Id. at 95.
[8] On January 8, 2014, the State charged Evans with murder and Class B felony
aggravated battery, later filing an additional information alleging that he was an
habitual offender. He was tried by a jury and found guilty as charged on May
11, 2017. On August 16, 2017, the trial court imposed a sixty-year sentence for
the murder conviction and enhanced that sentence by thirty years because
Evans was an habitual offender. He now appeals his sixty-year sentence.1
Analysis
[9] Evans argues that his sixty-year sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature
of the offense and his character. Indiana Appellate Rule 7(B) provides that we
may revise a sentence authorized by statute if, after due consideration of the
trial court’s decision, we find that the sentence is inappropriate in light of the
nature of the offenses and the character of the offender. When considering
whether a sentence is inappropriate, we need not be “extremely” deferential to
a trial court’s sentencing decision. Rutherford v. State, 866 N.E.2d 867, 873 (Ind.
Ct. App. 2007). Still, we must give due consideration to that decision. Id. We
also understand and recognize the unique perspective a trial court brings to its
sentencing decisions. Id. Under this rule, the burden is on the defendant to
1
Evans does not challenge the thirty-year habitual offender enhancement.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 84A01-1709-CR-2116 | May 4, 2018 Page 4 of 7
persuade the appellate court that his or her sentence is inappropriate. Childress
v. State, 848 N.E.2d 1073, 1080 (Ind. 2006).
[10] The principal role of Rule 7(B) review “should be to attempt to leaven the
outliers, and identify some guiding principles for trial courts and those charged
with improvement of the sentencing statutes, but not to achieve a perceived
correct result in each case.” Cardwell v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1219, 1225 (Ind.
2008). We “should focus on the forest—the aggregate sentence—rather than
the trees—consecutive or concurrent, number of counts, or length of the
sentence on any individual count.” Id. When reviewing the appropriateness of
a sentence under Rule 7(B), we may consider all aspects of the penal
consequences imposed by the trial court in sentencing the defendant, including
whether a portion of the sentence was suspended. Davidson v. State, 926 N.E.2d
1023, 1025 (Ind. 2010).
[11] Under Indiana Code Section 35-50-2-3, a person convicted of murder “shall be
imprisoned for a fixed term of between forty-five (45) and sixty-five (65) years,
with the advisory sentence being fifty-five (55) years.” Evans argues that his
sixty-year sentence is inappropriate because “Decker was the primary
aggressor”; that his own “actual participation in the fight was . . . not as
involved as Decker’s”; that Decker “apparently inflicted the fatal stab wounds”;
that the most serious offense on his extensive criminal history is a Class C
felony; that he suffers from mental illness and alcohol abuse; that he expressed
remorse at sentencing and offered condolences to Thomas’s family; and that he
“did not intend to seriously harm or kill Thomas,” whom he “had taken in”
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 84A01-1709-CR-2116 | May 4, 2018 Page 5 of 7
and “provided . . . with a home when Thomas needed help.” Appellee’s Br. p.
12, 13, 14.
[12] Regarding the nature of the offense, the record reveals that Evans and Decker
both viciously kicked, punched, and stabbed Thomas in an attack that ended his
life. The record is clear that Thomas died of a knife wound to his heart. As for
his character, in 1992, Evans was admitted to an inpatient program as a
juvenile “for his violent behavior” and “was diagnosed with oppositional
defiant disorder and conduct disorder.” Conf. App. Vol. III, p. 11. In 2001, he
was court-ordered to attend anger management courses, but was discharged for
failing to attend sessions. His pre-sentencing investigation report states, “[He]
stated that he is innocent in this case and that his drinking caused him to lie to
the police”; “[h]e has abused alcohol for many years and been referred to
treatment multiple times”; but “[h]e has never successfully completed
treatment.” Id.
[13] Evans’s criminal history includes three juvenile adjudications for theft and
alcohol consumption by a minor, as misdemeanors, and felony criminal
recklessness. As an adult, he has ten misdemeanor convictions for alcohol
consumption by a minor, driving with a suspended license (twice), receiving
stolen property, glue sniffing, public intoxication (three times), criminal
trespass, and possession of marijuana, as well as five felony convictions for
sexual battery, battery resulting in bodily injury, intimidation, and failure to
register as a sex offender, as Class D felonies, and Class C felony battery
resulting in bodily injury. In the instant offense, Evans looked on as Decker
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 84A01-1709-CR-2116 | May 4, 2018 Page 6 of 7
brutally kicked, punched, and smashed a fifty-pound table on Thomas’s head.
For his part, Evans looked around to see if he was being watched before he
stabbed Thomas; he also kicked Thomas as he lay unconscious and lied to
police investigators at the scene.
[14] Evans’s multiple contacts with the criminal justice system and court-ordered
participation in treatment programs or alcohol and drug abuse and mental
health issues have not deterred him from violent crime. Given his extensive
criminal history, including multiple battery convictions, his inability and
unwillingness to address his alcohol problem and to correct his behavior, the
viciousness of his attack on Thomas, and his fabricated claims of rogue
assailants and his own heroics, we cannot say that his sentence is inappropriate.
Conclusion
[15] Evans’s sixty-year sentence is not inappropriate. We affirm.
[16] Affirmed.
[17] Vaidik, C.J, and Pyle, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 84A01-1709-CR-2116 | May 4, 2018 Page 7 of 7