IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MINERVA VASQUEZ-MONTANO, AN No. 82687
INDIVIDUAL; AND GIOVANNI
JIMENEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL,
Appellants, FILE
vs.
SEP 0 9 2021
CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
EUZAM I:A. BROWN
PACIFIC, LLC, CLE OF PRE:vi
Res ondent. EY
DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing
appellant's complaint with prejudice. Second Judicial District Court,
Washoe County; Egan K. Walker, Judge. Initial review of the docketing
statement and documents before this court revealed a potential
jurisdictional defect. It appeared that appellants may not be aggrieved by
the challenged order such that they have standing to appeal. See NRAP
3A(a) (allowing an appeal to be filed by an aggrieved party).
"A party is 'aggrieved within the meaning of NRAP 3A(a) when
either a personal right or right of property is adversely and substantially
affected by a district court's ruling." Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg,
110 Nev. 440, 446, 874 P.2d 729, 734 (1994) (internal quotation marks
omitted). Appellants' docketing statement indicated that the issue on
appeal is whether the district court erred by dismissing the action without
ruling on a pending issue regarding sanctions. Respondent moved the
district court to dismiss appellants' complaint and the civil action with
prejudice. The motion to dismiss did not request that the pending sanctions
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(01 1947A leat
Ar
Zt- 2l3