Locke v. Locke

HARDIN", P. J.,

(concurring.) Although I joined in the decision of Stevenson v. Stevenson, 34 Hun, 157, I feel constrained to concur in the foregoing opinion upon the reasoning and authority •found in Romaine v. Chauncey, (Sup.) 15 N. Y. Supp. 198, and the same case in 129 N. Y. 566, 29 N. E. Rep. 826. I therefore join PARKER, J., in reversing the order in this case.