Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wniteb ~tate~ Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. 2012-1172 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson. APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2 ON MOTION ORDER AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corpo- ration America move without opposition for an extension of time until December 5, 2012, to file its response brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT OCT 19 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq. Donald R. McPhail, Esq. FILED Terrence D. Garnett, Esq. u.s.THE FEDEfl~l CIRCUITFOn COURT OF APPEALS OCT 19 ZU'IL s24 JANHORBAlY a.ERK