Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. mtniteb ~tate~ (!Court of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEl OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. 2012-1172 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson. APELDYN CORP v. AU OPTRONICS 2 ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corpo- ration and Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA's (collectively "CMO") motion for a one-month extension of time, until December 5, 2012, to file their response brief, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. CMO's response brief is due no later than December 5,2012. FOR THE COURT NOV 28 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Scott G. Seidman, Esq. Terrence Duane Garnett, Esq. U.s. COURf~~~EALS FOR THE FEDEP.~'. r.'tlCUIT Donald R. McPhail, Esq. NOV 28 Z012 s25 JAN HORBALY CLERK