NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
APELDYN CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU
OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION
AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,
Defendants.
______________________
2012-1172, -1173
______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
SCOTT G. SEIDMAN, Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke
& Booth, of Portland, Oregon argued for plaintiff-
appellant. With him on the brief were JON P. STRIDE and
DON H. MARMADUKE.
LAWRENCE J. GOTTS, Latham & Watkins LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees AU
Optronics Corporation, et al. With him on the brief was
ELIZABETH M. ROESEL. Of counsel on the brief were
TERRY D. GARNETT, VINCENT K. YIP, PETER J. WIED and
JAY C. CHIU, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles, Cali-
fornia.
DONALD R. MCPHAIL, Cozen O’Connor, of Washington,
DC, argued for defendants-appellees Chi Mei Optoelec-
tronics Corporation, et al. With him on the brief was
BARRY GOLOB. Of counsel was KRISTINA CAGGIANO,
Duane Morris, LLP, of Washington, DC.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, SCHALL, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 17, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk