United Parcel Service, Inc. v. BUREAU OF SAFETY AND REGULATION

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 13, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135509 & (48) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Maura D. Corrigan Petitioner-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices v SC: 135509 COA: 269720 Ingham CC: 04-001141-AA BUREAU OF SAFETY AND REGULATION, GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY DIVISION, Respondent-Appellant. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the motion to permit representation by foreign counsel is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows: The Michigan Administrative Code, Rule 408.13308(1), provides that “[a]n employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards that necessitate the use of personal protective equipment are present or are likely to be present.”1 Petitioner United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), received two civil citations for violating this rule. It is undisputed that UPS did not assess either of its Michigan workplaces. In a published opinion, the Court of Appeals vacated the citations, holding that UPS need not perform a separate hazard assessment at each workplace to comply with the rule.2 This decision will have serious implications on workplace safety in Michigan and appears to be contrary to the language of Rule 408.13308(1). The Supreme Court should grant leave to appeal to give this important issue the full consideration it deserves. CAVANAGH, J., joins the statement of KELLY, J. 1 This rule was promulgated under the authority of the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act. MCL 408.1001 et seq. 2 United Parcel Service, Inc v Bureau of Safety & Regulation, 277 Mich App 192 (2007). I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 13, 2008 _________________________________________ t0610 Clerk