Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

The Attorney (General of Texas JIM MATTOX February21. 1986 Attorney General Supreme Court Bullding Hr. Gibson DuTtrroCL opinionNo. m-444 P. 0. Box 1254S Chairperson Austin. TX 78711.254a Texts Committee00.hrchases of Rt: Applicabilityto counties. 51214752501 Products and Strriccs of Blind cities. hospitaldistricts,and Telex 9101874-1367 TekCOo*r 512/47w2SS and SsverelyDisabledPersona school districtsof chapter 122 314 EighlandMall Bwlsvard of the Eumtn Resources Code, Suite 258 which relatesto the procurement 714 Jackson. Suite 700 Austin. Texas 787!i:! of the products or strvicts of Oalhe., TX. 75202-4508 disabledindividuals 2t4il42.SQ44 Dear Mr. DuTtrroil: 4S24 Alberta Ave.. Sub 160 El Paso. TX. 799052793 You ask about zht apparentconflictbetween a statutethat allows 915/533-3184 political subdlvisioasto purchase products or strvlcts produced by disabled persons without engaging iu competitivebidding and statutes 1COt Texas. Suite 700 thtt require certain political subdivisionsto engage in competitive Hou+ton. TX. 77w2.3111 bidding. 7131223.5886 Section 122.Olli of the Eumau ResourcesCode provides: W5 Bmadway. Suits 312 A prodilct msnufacturtdfor salt to a political Lubbock. TX. 79401-3479 Soa747%38 subdivisionof this state or an offics or dtpart- mcnt thereof shall be manufactured or produced according‘tospecificationsdavelopedby the pur- 4MB N. Tenth. Suite B &tsar. Qolitical subdlvlslonof this state may YcAllm. TX. ?swl-les5 512aS2.4S47 purchase products or rervicts for its use from private I~t~sintsststhrough Its authoriasd pur- chasing p~xtdurts, but may substituteequivalent 200 M*in Plaza. Suite 400 products & ~trviccs produced by blind or other San Antonio, TX. 7S205-2797 severely zlsabltdpersons under the provisionsof 512!225-4191 this chap;tr. Nothing in this chaptershall be coastrutd%o require a nonprofit agency for blind An Equal Opporlunityl or other &vtrtly disabled persons to engage in Atllrmatlvo Action Employer compttit~~ bidding. (Emphasisadded). Tou ask whether counties. cities, school districts,and hospital districtsmay purcha,se products or strvicts from the disabledwithout engaging in compttirLvt bidding pursuant to section122.014even under circumstances %n rbich other statutes require them to engage in competitivebidding. In Attorney Geneera Opinion JR-385 (1985).we consideredwhether a county was requir,cd to complywith the competitivebidding procedure p. 2018 Fir.Gibson BuTerrol - Page 2 (Jt4-444) set out In the County PurchasingAct, article 2368a. V.T.C.S..before it could purchase goods or services from the disabled pursuant to section 122.014 of the Ruman Resources Code. Rtcaust specific statute6 prevail over general statutes on the same subject, we concludedthat the specificexceptionfrom competitivebidding set out in section 122.014 of the Buman Resources Code prevailed over the general requirementsof the County Purchasing Act when the county purchasedgoods or servicesf:romthe disabled. The same reasoning apl)Mts to the other political subdivisions you ask about. General statutesrequire cities, hospitals,and school districts to engage in competitivebidding before they make certain purchases. V.T.C.S.art. 238a. r2 (cities);V.T.C.S.art. 44940, 134 (hospitaldistricts);Educ. Code 121.901 (school districts). Those general statutes art inapplicable.however+ to a situation in which one of those subdivisionspurchases goods or services pursuant to I. section 122.014of the Buman ResourcesCode. SUMMARY General statute:8 that requirecounties,cities. hospital distrfctr;, and school districtsto engage in competitivebidding in order to make certain purchasesdo not c.pplyto purchasessuch political subdivisionsmake Ipursuantto section 122.014 of the &man RtsourccsCode. J h Very truly your A JIM MATTOX Attorney General of Texas JACR HIGRTOWRR First AssistantAttorneyGttLral WARYKELLER ExtcutP?t AssistantAttorneyGeneral ROBERT GRAY SpecialAssistantAttorneyGeneral RICR GILPIN Chairman,opinion conmittet Preparedby Sarah Wotlk AssIstant Attorney General p. 2019