Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTlN DearSir: Opinion No. 04093 Ret Door Wk. Team Hl&way Departm+nt hare authority to@ystroy luoh old nporbr anU noordm b&oh ax-ono% a0050a.important or whloh us not nupporting;to other dofnment8h ThirrWill a0rnow10dgerooalpt or your 3atter of Ootober 8, 19&l, wherein you xaque6t the optnlon of thls Dopart- &latenton the iaot 8ituatlon dt out therein a8 tollowar “For a number of years in the past, this Depnrkment bar noouaulat~da vast aiwunt of ol& rsoomle oonaiotlng or uetai1sureportsal&ubuplioatareooreuuhioh ara not important beaauas the orlglnal or swh raoord8 are on file either In tlm Highway Oaparbaent or the Stat44 Oomp troller's orrioe. Ibet of these moor&s hare not bee wed or~roferrebto ln several fbara. "'6-W.you please advfue this Department ii we hnoe authority to deatroy suoh 01.dr'eport%and reoords' whioh are not deemed lmportsnt or which are not supportingto other documenta? It is not our desire to deetroy any otficialmlriuteaor their oupportlng papers, nor any project oonstruptlon files, nor important oorrespondenoe. Your early ,advloswfl.1Le eppreolated.e ~Bnared on these faote you ank us the foll&tng qu%stion: DOW the Texas El&way Department have the authority to destroy such old reporta and ~oords nhich are not ~eemad lqortnnt OF which are not sup%sti:?g to other ~ooume~ltS, where .the orl(;iml of such reoords am on x3l.e wither In the Ri&hwny Reportment or the kitateComptroller*8oitioe? I@. D. C. Greer, page 8 Tlw Texas XlghwaJ papartatdat,being l area&m of the 8tatUt% a8 a gOverWUinta1 ag8noy, hU8 O&Y those p~uera #at are oonferred upon it by the statute, elthm expre88Q or by neoessary lzaplloatlon. iYehave been.unable to tin4 any provieionln the statute oreating the Tour8 Xl&away Department, which would authoriza the Dsgartrmnt,to destroy any of it8 original rsoords, and themfore no lapse of tiaiewould authorice the Qestaxctlon of artyoriginal rcoorda cf the Highway Dope+ent. A8 we understand tfleqwstlon propounded in your lett4r, hOW%Ver, :t is Wh8th%r Or tlQt the tighUu,yDepartment ha;etzzhght to Cemtroy copies af detailed rsgorte an4 dupll- - wkioh 6re not lqbrtant booauee the orlglnalaor suoh reoor4i'are on file either la the XlgbviayPe~artaent or the stats Comptroller~o 0rri00. It La ,tbo opinionof tide Departxent an4 you are thererors udvlem6 thqt in tha oa80 or the80 rc~oor48,whe~ thcioriglqale thi3r00roh r&aim4 in the flleo of the Xi&may Bopartmnt or the Stabs Oo8p~rell&8 offfa that you woulQ be autihorlned to 43wtxwptha aogles . You un4eratand or,oourui thatWe opinionI8 roe- rtriotodto the ~pooifio,raot 8ltuation pro8imteb La your letter or Ootober 3, 1943, and 8hull not be eon8ttie4~~ hold- ias that the Xl&way Depart&et kan geimral authority to dbrtroy it8 0ia x000*8. thut thio, Trut3tlng unmer8 your. queetlon,we ar8 Yours'very truly FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY Gm COMM‘ITEU