Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF W ATT- GENERAL Oy TIE&i Gerald c. Mann AttOl.IIeJ'General RonorrtbleL. R. Thoqson County Auditor Tely1oraounty Abilbns, Texas Deer Sir: opinion Ho. 0..375c Re: In it legal ior a trustee or an independent8ohooL dirtrlat to urve u a muE+er ot the opu6llu6tlon board ,iorthat diutrlot7 Fe are in reoelpt of yeurlattar in mhloh you request the opinion ot thio Department on the quwtion #.t out themin 118rOmW4J *1e it legtll for 6 truutesor an inuependuntmhwl dlatsiot to urn a0 (rnws?tvroi the eqwilfutlon bard r0r that dlatrlcrtf~ We assmnu that the sahool di8trlst ~44 0mM under tb gunoml3aw and uau not 4reatedby a rgbolalaet rhloh authorizedthe board of trusteeia to set a8 a board of eqllallzatlon. we believe the queotfon you ask wellanswerud by Oh4 TerarkanaCourt of tllollAppeals in tim aaee,oy St. Itouir SoutInveaternRailway Company of Texas t. Haples XndapUdent S4hool Dlrtrlot, 30 85.B. (8d) 709. The court stated ad r0ii0u8 : Vhe appellant presents the f'urther point that the &u&em of the school board were not enpoweredto met as a board 0r equelirintlonor 8sfb4sements ena IslQroaathe aawaemsnts. .15eheld in IEUler v, Vsncre,107 Tex+ a, lrnS.W* 739, ‘an indspendsnf s&601 CUetrlot WhOU taxes are oolleoted by oounty otrloials need not has6 a dietrial;board of equaliestion.~ Xt use later protided by the Aote of 19SS, ltokartiole SW=, R, 8. 19eb. 118 ~ ialleWS J "'ft shall bo withiz the diaorztionor the board of tN5tW.6 of 6&q ~ndqjUu%~t eOh@oldlstr%otto name an eusemor of taxeswho rhall aseou the taxableproperty within the limits ot the indopendsztimhooL dlutri48 within the time and in the manner provlbd by axht%rq law, ia so far a8 they are ag~lloabXe,and when mid wossmont has been lqtialined by a beard of lqualizetlozappointed by the boar& or Wnatess ier that pqtaee, shall prepem the tar rolls of said (Ii&riot and shall duly zigz and urtily uao to the oountp tax oolleotor a4 pmrfd#tior in the 4u44esdi.n~ artiolo.* *In the resent oan tr u r tes lxeraiwd the board OS8 on' to have the tacos of their dltirlet their *dLarat '; usoued by the t%ams8orrpeeially appoln%& ior the pur- A8 a 44n*oqu4n44 or 4uah e&lon, the duty then Ct&ea upon tth8 board of tzwtout to appoint *a bimzd o flquallzatkoont for ths sohool.distrlat. Ths statute 6lreothn that %nx u& ell b elpWrUteU by en 0ffl414l BeuU of oqtmliaetlon beeme Uqmublre aad aat CcLaom- a9 Gy4. 08. pt lW& *Thor;lsht ii~rumU tD0hav4 in u8u~t rnleu8U'~ u l8lu 4quJJ in1 WA*; on Tazation (Se.M.) p* 991, ‘is on0 0fwUs.h an own&r shouldnotba danied.~ Quoting, as amplieabla* fma the 4440 of Xlller v. Van40, su N: ~Inbpud8nt sshool disttists wbloh do not have ttair taxes un8nU by the amtity~aannor we aloarly oblQeU to pmri8e s baud of squallzetionbefore whiah the oitlson i8 antitle t,oappear and bo barb upon any aaseetment of ais propsrty+t "In requiring the board of equalizationto be *appalnWd by ths board of trusteee,‘it BarUlot b’ pond that aa8 “*$ law oontssplatedtho ioM.owiag aetlan of t o board of trus- ten: 'The sohool bsard met in pe+@Uc 8o6slo~,wl%h tW .iollanlngmember8 pruont (Hero follow ths n8zM +&&a @Hell tNStOOr ) J aad 8 E4titW -4 Md4 that th0 44h401 beup ait as a board of lgualizatlozin tM8, azd tho m&ion was OarrlOQ.' *The 89ratutoplainly crrldw4oe the will of the 24&g%+ laturo to grant thr powor to the board ot trustttesti3s*lOQb and appoint aa eiiiaial board of lquallzetionof aseumnants to be ooapouoQ, not or thmMlYe4, but of other gua~lf&td and &table pclraoner Tho wzrds of ths grant of sutherltr, whibh alone @an justify the 44%~ OP ths board oi'Q?tts*e~e, ,. 57% IfanSrabLo t. R. Th0111peon,pago 3 mnnot be extended by iraplibation or inforonoe to inclube the authority to ah&one and appoint th4rmolver to be the ,board of equlleation. In this view OS the rrtatuts the board of trusltees wore without any authority, end it was an abrolutely void not, as must be legally mgarUed, to appoint the~sltss as the board of oquall- mtlon of asees4amnta. The principle ie a48 out in 45 C, T. 0 43, B. 940, n4melyt tit 13 aontrary to the polioy of the lmw for (III offiaer to us8 his oflTiotal appointiry: power to pleoe himself in offloe, 60 that, 4V4lI ill th iIbBOU44 of statutory inhibition, al.l offloon who have the epgolntlng power er4 dioqualified for I Jw pointment to the offleoll to whioh they may appoint.** In the above qwtod 48~4 Q-IOoourt holds board ot trust448 of an ind4ondont eohool dlstrlot a point it8412 a8 tho boerd of equallaetton.‘PhB 40Urt Duu &J oonoluaien upon the rea8on ~RWK& othora thnt I tn, the pub110 polioy for an offloor to UBO Ma oft lag powor to plaoeLhimae.Lf in an aftloo. This roa6 UJ&Y with l qtral fore. to tha rftuatton hero a6 wol I x8PlOIS Iadopondont Sahool Dlakiat ease - whore the att in to nppsint ono trwtbo on z;hsboard or oqnalkzatlon Fat TL $&en where the entire board of trustoer wa8 appointed as the b@iX't%Of 6+ldiZ6tiOXl. We trust that the rOregoia&fu.llywm~ora your Yours rsry bruly ATTORWEY G- OB TXXAB