Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN ,Awc.- .amm aDI- Eonorabla J . P. Bryan county vttonug ma zoria county aqlotoa, Texee wo haro Oard by you In your reoent 1 a prrrum ml& be prop iag 8rr*st* under a given . #‘aq u o te l p o r tio n of your letter: ith him when 0r 0th8r people, ad the prlscumr 0 140150 amI ran, tlm offloer not to of th8 Penal Cod. of Texal),1935, reda h.rA, 9erson aha11 wllnlllr OPRu8@ or rssiat en ortioar in ex*auting or attrmptuag to exeoute any lawful *drru%t for the arrerrt of another PerlBOllIn a mh4owanor oam. or In arrest&G or attemtine to a**8t aai mc- aon wit&out a warrant, wlmro the law author- har or raauuiree tha erreat to be m&U with- out tt WuTant , ha shail~ be ruta not ioar panorabl.J. 3. Bryaa, Pa&p 8 aanq t&an twenty-flve nor maw than five hundred -- dollars, and if arm be web, be f laed not less than rlrtr nor more than one thousand 1.~ dollars.* (mId.roooriagours.) The above statute oontalno two elau8e0, on. for- bidding aal perma to oppose or reOl8t an offioor In exeout- lng or attempting to exeout. a lawful warrant for the arrest of *another perllon;"the oth.r make. it a mi.d.a..uorto wl3Xuay ogp000 or raslet an orrloer in arresting or attempt- ing to arroet *any peraon” without a rarrclnt where the law authoriaeo or requires the arrest to be rade without a war- rant, aad t& latter phase applleo wh4re luoh arrest is either for a felony or ai4demanor. Se. 3ootloa 914, Branoh iau. P. c. p. 309. Artiole 341 of tb8 Pens1 Cod0 doflaeo bpn ofienw of the aoouoed resisting arrest bao.6 oa a lepl warrant, but the only peml provlaloa oonduaa5.ng oae re.latfogarrest without warrant lo aontained in mttole 339, aupra. mat a proseoutloawould lie in a proper oaoo uador ouch $.rtlolo 3%. even when the ottlam lo oppo4.d or re8ist.d by the ea- awed ratbsr tlaa SOW wothar per8on* is dl.olooed by a oareful nadln(i of the oa.4. of k?oodward v. state, St3 Tax. cr. 8. 4lE, 1M S. B. 371; liarteesv. Ytate, 8% Tax. Cr. R. 519, 109 S. W. OS4 and L.. v. Stat., 43 Tex. Cr. 8. 04, 74 S. Vs.88. The r&ht OS the offloerto make the arrest xlthout rsrrant pp(lot olearly appear and bo properly alleged in the lndiottmnt or lafommtloa and coaplalnt. &rl.ao v. State, oupra; Shaw v. State, 113 Tax. Cr. Ii.160, 18 3. &. (3d) 688. In the 0.8. of Lo. v. State, oupra, the defendantwa. ohmgob with resisting an ortfaer, tin iaato lkmwlq aeveral p4rtieo h&d beon giambling,that the ofiiaer aneetod on. of th4a and 8tart.d to leave th. protines, hvlag proo4.d.d a short dletanao when hs deaided to mmroh hla prisoner. Dafead- ant lntorosd.6on behalf of tE* prf4on.r, throwln$ the offlorr to th. sound and taking hi. pl.tol. The aovrt said tb arreet. wa. an illsgl on4 and also held th. ooaplalat and iniommtion d.r4ctlvo, but furttmr held the lvldeno. iasufficiont oayimgt "l * * Ii tM.8 t.otfsP~ b4 tlw., it show. that t'heprlooa4r having trouble tith 'mnlinooa bad already been placed uador arrest in 40 tar as to oon~~lywith th4 0rri04r*0 rob- quest, aad had aooomp*nled hla oonm di&snOo. If there was aa arroot at all w&OP the Ofr- oumtmmoe, lt ha4 been aaaompliahod.* Honorable2. P. Brycan,Page 3 iVhll4we have haroln dleoues4dthe offerme of "realstingarrest*, under the authority of the Leo oase, we do not thln& the ematwhile prisoner of pour orrlaer ootid b4 suao444rullypro44outedrm suah orren44. Uador pour stat4 of faote, it appara the arr44t h4d alreadr been perfootrd,and tha proper prooedurofor the officer to take would be to file 00.tboae aiding the prlaonor to 44oap4, under the provlalons0r Article 330, Pen81 code. The pertinent part of t&it statute reeds no follows: %hoever wllfull~ aids a prisoner to ercape froa the custody of an offiaer * * * while being detained in austody on an aeouoa- tlon for slndemanor, by doing an ast aaloulated to 4rr40t that obfeat, shall be fad not OX- oesding rive hundred dollara; and if lo aiiliag in the esoape he &all lPaka us4 of arms, he nhaU be fined not exoeedlngone thouaaad dol- . lar4." In construing thfe statute the court of Crliiifnal Ippealr in the oaae of kWmmn v. iX&te, 44 Tax. Cr. R. 463, 72 'j.vt.l&4, hae Bald: *A person is said to be *noawed of au off4ns4 frolgth4 tla4 that any *ariminalao- tlon* ahall have bean eoamenood a&ainot him. A legal arrest wlthout wartiant;a oomplalnt LO a 0agl4tratO; a WaXTMt lO@.ly 14OU4d; and indictsent,or an information,are all exeinpleoof ~aaoueatioal,aaa a person pro- coedeelagainat by either of tho44 Lo said to be * aoaueed’ “. The "eaoapo* effected by the pereon under arrest ~44 not 1x1it44i.ia violation or poeftlve law for which he Gould bo ouaceesf ully proaeout4d. Veal 1. State, 36 Tax. Cr. R. 2E0, lu) S. W. 1731 17 Tar. Jur. 38. Frm your otateawnt of the care it la not alear what,XSM~ wea used by the prisoner kn makiug eood his eaoape. If the 11111fact4 develop the e8eential elomenta of an a48ault. the proscautioncould wall be for aggravatedassault UrraW the flret paragraph of xrtlole 1147, Penal Codo, whioh pro- vides t&t an amault booome4 aggravated *when oomlttcrd UpOn 0frlOer in th4 lawful dlsoharge 0r the dutir4 or hle or- LzIl floe. if it was imown or deolared to the offendor that the ., Honorable J. P. Bryan, Pay 4 pertsonassaulted was an oftioer disehnFgingtinofficial duty.- Trustfng the abors setlefnotorllyermmrs y0iU inquiry, *e arta BY n&ueln Boodell A68i8tlUlt