Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN umn~titutiimal 3ct ragulaititq the oollootlon of dabte pro- tactad clerks c,r courts actlni; uncor it.1 ‘=tu oorraat rule la sucolnotly atst3d ba ,53x. hi?. : *iii otllcar rb, withaat authority of law. aoU3ata taasm or oxeos8ivr 138s .tiy 5s oompsllrd’ to raimburso th parrron rxm whom the money MI raoeivrd. Zut iesa poti volunur’l3.y 4nd rrith full xnowl~ribr of the facts, though w&r a slataka oi law, canaat under aottlod ~:rinol~lre, be rocavsr~C.* (3A :sr. Jur. L76; 32 :3x. Jur. ) 739; .d,rsh- llsld vs. z-t. .sorth :iatl. :lzmk. 83 :0x. 452, 18 t:i 743; County of Gdvo3tm Tn. Cortim, L9 hr. 279, 303; at’ Of iiaurton '13. i'lOEUI?, 76 Tax. 365, 13 2% 266. )