., q
~.n:.;x : OFFlCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
.j..,,,
;‘:
AUSTIN
., .: ibnuary -la,1939
Your rorp33t for cn a3 rsahxl bg t!d.f~
of-
You c&z the follovdq
on cxt0a3loaof!c tern
er caatandia:the ten ro-
fleets that t!Ia the hllld Jury to con-
tlnua its delibe -.
1 f3tatutca,
Um, and Al-Mole
, pg. iX.3431, 4ra tb stitdutas
f t:ieDistrict Cou?t.
CO. ‘(c02~1~33~0n or
‘..’
* of tho p.Irtioularccec on account of
not the exteneionof tic tern bpmr-
\
,320~to authorize a Diotrict Sud,g to
oscarf to dim030 of "oanding litigstionw.
\
i
j
_ / ..c
? C’
Y\ /’
yo : .L ‘-,I.
:
,.~,&OR Ln order to dis?oso of ">sndiag litigation*by otiltiw the
~CSUSO~ Par the OXIXXS~O~ to be Lo cllo-.vtke GrarC Pury to continue
its deL,,~,cr~tions, To tLic ozdcr, tho corncats, quoted bolTp;l,
of
- Judge 3nviLso!1i?.23 dissczt* &nlon, in f2x3 ccne 0r AlOxr~~cr
V. state* 234 S.X. 644, sso epplicablo:
..
n* * * th3‘t&~ti03 if th0 ~ti’~sl0~ or the
ten under &-tic30 172G ortho Revised Civil Stat-
utoo (Ann :rticle 19233)hzs no ‘ap.n3&xition. The
ev',doncoand the blSL escludou the idea that them
54s a ~om3.n.~trial bcrcrc the cart zt tke t5.23
tb order \933 entcm?. TLc 0nlJ i043on m3 tbut
t!~ Gr&d July raqcestod it, that they &$A bo
enabled to dis?ooe of?'so1pzxttcn they 'haduncer
lnvest1~ution."
For thfjreasons statsd, we sra of the opi;lionth2t under :
t& oircumstanoes,the'indictmld;syou mztion'are inmlkd.
Yours,rospectmy