Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

@ffice of tfp ~ttornep QBenera~ &ate of IEexas DAN MORALES ATTORNEY GENERAL July 9. 1993 Honorable Jack Henington OpinionNo. DM-233 District and County Attorney P.O. Box 364 Re: Whether the Texas Department of Red River county courthouse Crimhtd Justice may operate a work Clarksville.Texas 754260364 program facility that produces goods and services that are marketed for profit or exempted under the Federal Private Jndustry Enhancement Program and related question (BQ-504) Dear Mr. Herrington: On behalf of Bed Biver County, you have asked us to determine whether the Texas Department of CriminalJustice (the “TDCJ”)may own or operate a work program facility that qualifiesfor exemption under the Private Industry EnhancementProgram of title 18 of the United States Code, section 1761(c). You also ask whether chapter 497, subchapter C of the Government Code authorizes the TDCJ to own and operate a work program facility. Both of your questions are based, at least in part, on chapter 497 of the Government Code. Among other things, chapter 497 creates the prison industries office in the institutional division of the TDCJ and establishes a work program plan involving municipalities and counties. Subchapter A creates within the institutional division of the TDCJ a prison industries office “to provide adequate employment and vocational training and development and expansion of public and private prison industries.” See Goti Code @ 497.001, 497.002(a). To that end, section 497.004(a) requires the director of the institutiottal division of the TDCJ to use inmate labor in the prison industries program to the greatest extent feasible and to develop and expand the prison industries program through arrangements with private business for the use of inmate labor. Bur see gene&y Letter opinion No. 8867 (1988). Subchapter C requires the pardons and paroles division of the TDCJ to establish a work program plan, under which the pardons and paroles division may transfer an eligible person gem the institutiomd division or a county jail to a work facility that a municipality or county owns and operates. Gov’t Code 8 497.053; see Attorney General Gpiion JM-1212 (1990) at 1. While the work facility participant resides at the facility, he or she remains in the technical custody of the pardons and paroles division. See Gov’t Code 8 497.053; Attorney General Opinion JM-1212 at 1. The municipality or county owning and operating the work facility must comply with the requirements articulated in p. 1207 Honorable JackHenington - Page 2 (uu-233) shchapter C. includingdistriig a resident’searnings as required in section 497.056(b) and ensuing that residents are paid wages at least as high as the prevailing wage for similarwork in the area or conuntmity. Gov’tCode 5 497.057. You first ask whether the TDCJ may own and operate a work program Exility that is exempt under title 18 of the United States Code, section 1761(c). We note, first, that the term “work program facility”or “work fhcility”refers to a fhility owned and operated by a municipality or county pumuant to a contract with the pardons and paroles division under chapter 497, subdrapter C of the Government Code. Because the TDCJ is not a municipality or county, a&chapter C does not apply to it. Instead, pumuant to chapter 497, subchapter A, the TDCJ may operate a “prison industries program” at each wrrectional facility that the director of the institutionaJdivision considers suitable. See id. 8 497.002(b). Jn general, title i8 of the United States Code, section 1761(a) &minaMs the transportation in interstate commerce of “any goods, m or merchandisemanufacture produced, or mined, wholly or in part by convicts or prisoners, except convicts or in any penal or reformatory institution.’ See a& IVeufworfA v. So&m, 548 E?4: ‘A5 (8th Cii. S.D. 1977) (noting district court construction of 18 U.S.C. 5 1761(a)). See generallly fintuc~ Whip & Cohr Co. v. IllitwisCent. RR. Co.. 299 U.S. 334 (1937) (considering constitutionality of Ashurst-Sumners Act,codiSedas18 U.S.C. Q§ 1761, 1762). Subsection (c), about which you ask, exempts goods made by convicts or prisoners who are participating in one of not more than titty nonfederal prison work pilot projects that the Diior of the Bureau of Justice Amistance has designated and who meet other specified conditions. You have made numerous arguments that goods rnamhhd in a TDCJ prison industries program ate not exempt under subsection (c). We need not determine whether you are correct, because we believe that such goods are excepted from section 1761 under subsection (a), as goods manufd by convicts or prisoners in a penal or refomtatory institution. Second,yourskwtKthatheTDCJmayownmdopaateaworLprogramfacility under chapter 497. tabchqw C of the Go- Code. As we stated above. the term “work program fhcility”or “work tbcility”refers only to a facility owned and operated by a municipality or county. Therefore, subchapter C by its terms authorizes only municipalitiesand counties to own work program f&iJities. Goti Code 5 497.055(b). A work program facility may be operated only pumant to a contract between the pardons and paroles division of the TDCJ and the municipality or county in which the facility is located. Id. Thus, the TDCJ may not own or operate a work program facility. It may. however, operate a prison industries program under chapter 497, subchapter A of the Govm Code. p. 1208 Honorable Jack Hcnington - Page 3 (DM-233) SUMMARY Section 1761(a) of title 18, United States Code. accepts 6om the federal prohibition against the transportation in interstate wmmercc of prison-made goods those goods inmates or prisoners manhctured in a prison industries program that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice operates pursuant to chapter 497. ahchapter A of the Govment Coda. Chapter 497. subchapter C of the Government Code does not authorize the TDCJ to own and operate a work program fkcility;such thilities may be owned only by a municipalityor county and operated pursuant to a contract between the pardons and paroles divisionof the TDCJ and the municipalityor wunty in which the work program facility is located. DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas WILL PRYOR Firat Assistant Attorney General MARYKELLBR Deputy Attorney General for Litigation RBNEAHIcKs State Solicitor MADELEINE B. JOHNSON Chair, Opiion Committee p. 1209