Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable Robert S. Calvert Opinion No. M-310 Comptroller of Public Accounts State of Texas Re: Whether property of State Capitol Rullding the Housing Authority Austin, Texas 78711 of the City of Harlln- gen would be subject to ad valorem taxes In view of the fact that a small portion of said property will be let to concessionaires who would operate the facilities to serve Dear Mr. Calvert: the residents. You recently requested the oplnlon of this department on the following question: “Whether any part of a five story hotel purchased by the Housing Authority of the City of Harllngen to be utilized as low Income housing for the elderly, would be subject to ad valorem taxes, If a small portion of the lower floor of such hotel be let to concesslon- sires who would operate facilities to serve the residents. ” The Housing Authority of the City of Rarllngen is authorized by Article 1269k of Vernon’s Civil Statutes. Section 22 of said Article provides: “The property of an authority Is declared to be public property used for essential public and governmental purposes and such property and an authority shall be exempt from all taxes and special assessments of the city, the county, - 1510 - . * Hon. Robert S. Calvert, Page 2 (M-310) the State or any political subdivision there- of; provided, however, that In lieu of such taxes or special assessments, an authority may agree to make payments to the city or the county or any such political subdivision for Improvements, services, and ‘facilities furnlsh- ed by such city, county, or political sub- division for the benefit of a housing project, but In no event shall such payments exceed the estlmated cost to such city, county, or political subdivision of the Improvements, services, or facilities to be so furnlshed.“~ In Attorney Qeneral Opinion No. O-1921 (1940), the Attorney General’s Department ruled that the statutory exemption given In Section 22 of Article 1269k, supra, was a constitutional exercise of power by the legislature. In conclusion this opinion provided: “In our opinion, Section 22 of Article 1269k, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, commonly known and cited as the ‘Housing Authorities Law’ is a constitutional exemption from taxation, and property owned by the Housing Authority of Browns- ville, Texas, duly created under sald Act as a public body corporate and politic, and an agency or Instrumentality of the State of Texas, under its police power, is ‘public property used for public purposes, ’ entitled to exemption from State and County ad valorem taxes under said ‘Housing Authorities Law’ and controlling constitutional provisions. ” The controlling constitutional provision referred to in that opinion is Article VIII, Section 2, Constitution of Texas, which provides, in part: 11 the Legislature may, by general laws,‘e;empt from taxation public property used for public purposes. . .” Although the result reached in that opinion is still correct, the Supreme Court of Texas In City of Beaumont v. i - 1511- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, Page 3 (M- 310) Fertitta, 415 S.W.2d 902 (Tex.Sup. 1967)~ has held that Article VIII, Section 2, supra, did not apply to publicly owned property, and accordingly Attorney General Opinion No. O-1921 (1940) is modified to the extent of such holding and any conflict with this opinion. Regard- ing lands owned by the City of Beaumont, the Court stated at page 909: Respondents contend that since this property is public property not used for public purposes the Leglslature is prohibited from exempting It from taxation by Article VIII, Section 2, of the Consti- tution. While property owned by cities Is public property, It is not the type of public property to which Article VIII, Section 2 is applicable . . .' In the course of its opinion. the Court reaffirmed its holding In Daugherty v. Thompson,-71 Tex. 192, 9 S.W. 99, wherein it -what by the words "public proper- ty used for public purposes as used in Article VIII, Sec- tion 2, in these words: -That section of the constitution seems to apply to owned bye property persons or corporations in private right, but which, from the use to which it is applied, Is, in a qualified sense, deemed public property. This construction does not allow any application of said provision to property of a Housing Authority. Further- more, the Court in City of .Beaumsnt v. Fertitta, supra, held in effect, that publicly owned property was not required to be taxed by the Constitution: "Itcan be readily seen that the only propertyrequired to be taxed by the Constitution Is private property held by natural persons or private corporations. (Emphasls ours. - 1512- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, Page 4 (M-310) Since publicly owned property is not required to be taxed, the Legislature may tax or choose not to tax such property. By exempting the property of Housing Authorities in Section 22, of Article 1269k, the Legislature has clearly chosen not to tax such property. City of Beau- mont v. Fertltta, supra. This opinion does not purport to pass on any question of whether taxes can be lawfully assessed against the lease- hold interest of a lessee of the Housing Authority, as where the property is held under a lease for a term of three vears or mbre‘under the provisions of Article 7173, Vernon's &Gil Statutes. See City of Beaumont v. Fertltta, supbra, holding that a tax on t'he leasehold was assessable not against the City but against its lessees. SUMMARY .There is no constitutional pro- hibition against a complete exemption from taxation of property of a Housing Authority and such an exemption is clearly given In Article 1269k, Section 22, Vernon's Civil Statutes. The Legislature in said exemption chose not to tax the property of a Housing Authority; there- fore, the property of the Housing Authority of the City of Harllngen is not taxable, even though a portion of the property is let to concessionaires operating the facilities to serve the residents. Attorney General Opinion No. O-1921 (1940) Is modified to the extent that Article VIII, Section 2 of the Constitution of Texas does not apply to publicly owned property, as determined In City of Beaumont v. Fertitta, 415 S.W.2d 902 (Tex.Sup. 1967) Thi I i does not pass on the taxability of l~a~~h%~ interests of lessees of the Housing Authority and arising under a lease for a term of three - 1513- -, . Hon. Robert S. Calvert, Page 5 (M- 310 1 years or more pursuant to the provisions of Article 7173, Vernon's Civil Statutes. Yours very truly, AtFrney General of Texas Prepared by Wardlow Lane Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns B. Taylor, Chairman Alfred Walker Bill Allen Harold Kennedy Arthur Sandlin A. J. CARUBBI, JR. Executive Assistant -1514-