Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN lionorablaI. Pradeoki County A&t op QalveatoR county Qalveaton, Teras Dear art Your 16tter ltlttg th eo p inio n 0rthis department OR c , reads h p a r t as followai . girlattIres. 4mpta to amwad t called a4aaio~ or a emoted as a ape- 226 of the Qmeral and irat alled aeaalo~ of la~r~apaokallp requested es to lity of both H. B. #73 and the tad, rafarriidto as 9. B. #86, 9a Qalv4aton county,the CdPnnlralWr rqre- SetttingPrao. #2 la entirely Within the oity llmlta Ot Qalveiaton and th4re me no roads la this Pre- oiaot. The Seavall built by Galveston County and the Boulevard, which la used as a driveway,~is part Bonomble I. Prsdooki, page 2 ol tha protcatlva vork and Is pS&tISlly vlthln the lisita Of PreOinot #2, *ghoul.+you find thla bill constitutional, please advise me igouI am to dotamine hdhsr the Oom.fgaionera have Inourred the upmae provfdod ror, vben on oirlolal duties and when for personal USO* l (I . . . . Senate Bill Bo. 286, dots of the 48th IsgIrZatwe, RegliiarSeesion, 1943, reads 88 iollovat “An Aot to amend House Bill Ho. 73, an Aot passed by the First Called Ssaalon of the 33rd fsg- IaltWtr~ or the State or Tezaa to Oreate a more ei; fe.otive,road system for Qalvraton County, Tu483 Gk~q oounty COmi.8aioneraof said county ox-of- fiolo preolndt rottd mnaaIa~al~nera and peao&i~Lag their duties as auah etoi by addhg Seotion 2a pro- vrding for additional dutlea of the County C-S- aloners and by addhg Seotlon 2b p~ovldlngfor the payment of travellag expenaea to the Connty Cow UaaIab3ra, r0r the sac of their.private automo- bller, ohen Inoorred only In the perio&leanMOf their off'Iof.aldutleg pertaining to the mkinteme of the ~publiaroardoend hlghvaya OS aald countyi and deol4rIng an enlargeaoy. I STATE OF .aBXIT EMCl’BD BY THE LBaISLWJRE OF Tlfli mt “se0t10n 1. That Bouae ii.11go. 73, passed et the Flirt Called $eaaIoa of the 33&d k?giSlStWS of the State or Texas be amended by adding thereto *atiOXl 24 to &eSd 88 fOlhf8t I “V3eotion2(a). The County CimotIaaIonera ahall nmke an fttapeotlonof the publio roads, U&h- Tot, 4nd other ttppurtettanceapert4InIugthereto within their reapeative~praoinotaand vithIn their ~u&Isdiotiondurlng or Immediately after the 006u& &awe or any storm, flood o& hIgb tide, the 000~ &WKm of uhIoh would probably damage 'or Obrtruot Honorable I. Predeoki,, page 3 said pubUa roads, hLghuay8 and appurtenances. fi awh inrpeotlonreveala that said roada, high- oaya and apput%wutaea have bean med or ob- atruoted In any COUtIty CWI8i88iOn8rS QFednOt, it ahall be the duty or said Ooanni8alommto oloae said road, hlghuay o& ap urtenanor OP to ln8tall adequate fao~~ltlea andpor varnlng sign5 4t or naar the laene of said damage OP obstruotlon,auffl- oiest to Yarn the pub110 thereof, and to proaeed as soowas 1s poraible thereefter to have such damage repaired and obatruatlonremoved therefrobl.' %ac. 2. That House RI11 Ho. 73, passed at the Firrt CallcidSession of the 33rd LegIalature, of the State of Texas be amended by addi- thmeto Section 2b to read 8s follovat “Qieotlon 2(b). The County Com.laatintwa 0r Oelveaton County, Texas, are each hereby alloved 8otual traveling expenses not to exceed the sum of Fifty ($50.00) Dollars per month iOr thr r;rte .Qf their private automobiles, rovlded hweoer tkat 8uCh traveling axpenaea 8haE 1 be alloved only vhan lncorred by the County CwmI88Iohera In the pePform- actOeof their duties pert8lnIttg to the m9intezlame of the publlo roads and highuayr.of said oounty. Raoh oounty oomPrlasIoner in~u&rIng luah expense ahall file a olalm vltb the CommI8alonera Court, and, if aqid o&Da Is in order, 8ame SW be ap- proved, alloved and ordered paid by said court as 8 alaim agalast the oouatg, said alaim ahall be paid out of the road and ridge fqnd of aaid Ooun- ty In the aam manner es provided by law for the PayBent of other Otiims f&slasaid fund.' *SW. 3. The feat that Oalveoton County la MY vlthout an adequate road lav, and Is urgently in need o fluoh a law, oreatea 811emergencryaad an iR&mratlve publlo neoeralty, that the bttst~ttttIOn- al Rule requiring bills to be read on three revere3 day8 i.ueach Ziouse be euapended, and the 8eme is hereby suspended,and that thI8 Act take sffeot and be In force from and after It8 pa88age. and It Is 80 enaoted.a Bonoreble I. RedeokI, page 4 Rouse Bill Ro. 73, Aots of the 33rd Legfal4ture, First called sea8Ion, 1913, was enaoted a8 a apeolal road law under the prOvi8fO~Of AFti VIII, Station 9,Of the Constitutionof this State. Senate Bill Ho. 286, Aota of the 48th Legial4tur8,Regular Seesion, 1943, al80 va8 enect- ed as 8 special lav for Galveston County under the p&ovirion8 of Artiole VIII, Seation 9, OS the ConrtItutlOn,8mendIng House Bill Ro, 73, 8upra. St i8 8tat8d In the 0888 Of CFOV V. Ti,IlIi8&, 47 S.U. (26) 391 (tinner II.Crow, 78 S.Y. (2d) fi88)t *lie8the law enacted for the better raaln- ten4nce of road5 in Xi11 dountyt The Legialetu&e by houae,blll Ilo.500 had pleoed new 8nd tUltIon- al burdens On the oonrmiaaIone&8 vlth reference to the roads of Xi11 county. The purpose Ye8 to aecure a better system of roala for the aounty. It ua8 apparent that the aomfs8Ioner8 vould imur extra expenre in diaah8rgfng there nw dutler. In return, the amendment in queatioa undertook to compensatethem out of the road ad bridge Sund Sor the erpenaea so l.nourred. The use by the com- olirsloneraof thei.&private autowbllea So& the 8oaosplMunent of this purporo end in coxineotion vfth such work alelearlyhad to.do vith the Qaain- tenenoe of the publio roads’ of the Couuty, and if 80, the Isgl.aleture bad the authority under the Conatltutionby a loaal lav to authorlae the Iwe or 8 part or the road end bridge fUnd8 to aa- OOD@irh thi8 plU’pOae. A careful 8uperviaiott 0s the &08ds by the oommI88loner8Ye8 as esaentIal to the maintenanae of the road8 end the areetlon of en etfialent 8y8tem as vould have been the mper- Vlalon thereoi by a afvil engineer. If the oom- ~8rioM&a vere to arruae end diaaharge these bUTdsn8, it vaa ea8entlal that they be provided vlth the mean8 of doing 802 This could h8ve been dono either by provLdLng the UNUM of conveyanoe OF by oompen8atingthe oomnlsrlonem for the ex- Rena88 Inuurred by them isdoing so. “It la true, that the building and minten- anC* OS ro4da is a part 0s the affair8 of a co~unty Nonorable I. Predeakl, pega 5 and that 8 special lav reguhtlq the melntenenae or roads ir to a aertaln extent a lev regulating the arfalra or the oourityibut, ii auoh special lav undertakesto regulete only that part 0r the arrairr of a county pertaining ta the maintenanae of roedm, it 1s not prohibited by the Constitution. Chler Justice Phillips in Altgelt t. Outaelt, 109 Tex. 123, 201 9; Y. 400, 401, said: ‘So doubt the Lag- islaturcbin the passage of looal roed lams, may, vithin proper bounds, provide aompenaationfor extra sarvloea to be perrormed by those Offlelala (the aommfsalonera)vhere uaaontrolledby general lava and required by such loaal laws and dfreatly oonueoted vlth the malntenanae of the publla roads.” (3eeEltchena et al. P. Roberta, 24 S.V. (26) 464, Jenteson,et al. v. Smith, 161 S.V. 520, Austin Broa. v. Patton. 288 9.Y. 182. and WLnn v. John- son, 91 S.Y. (2ii) 499.) - As heretofore stated Senate M3; Ho. 286, sUJU’8, 1s a speafal road lav and vaa enaated as Thie Act is limit- ed to the maintenance of publia roads and &poses added and nev . . ._ imposed by general lav-and provides duties-not for reimburse- mew or toteoounty aoamuaalonera ror aertarn expenses Lneurrea by them as authorized by said bat. Far the reasons stated here and the,roregolngauthorities ue regard said Senate Bill Bo. 286 constitutional,end so hold. You also j.nQuireas to the oonatitutlonaUty of House Bill Ro. ‘73,au ra. What has been said vlth reference to Senate ~111 NO. 28g, is equally applicable to House Bill lb. 73, Therefore, it is our opinion that seld House Bill 810. 73 la conatltutional. You further ask in e&feat, it the bill 16 found to be COMtitutitialj-how are you to .determinevhether the O~IU- ~~slonera have inawred the expere provided for? Senate Bill Ho. 268 e.xpr+ralgprovided that eaah cosmaiasloner ln- curlna ruch expense shall ills a o1ai.mvlth the aommlsObon- *w’ aourt, and, if such alaim la in order, same shall be ap- pEoved, allowed and ordered paid by said aourt as a Olaim *UUut the county. Said hot further providea that such tr*vellngexpense shall be allowed only vhen lnourred by the county oomtnisalaaer~in th4 performenae or their dutlea per- t** to the mefntenanae OS public roads end hi&fey8 of sai oounty. Honorable I. Predeakl, page 6 It la our oplnlon that in view of the hot under con- sideration the aommlaaionera~ court determines the amount of expense lnaurred for traveling expensea by the county oonmfa- sioners Por,the use of their wlvate automobiles end that when a olalm for such expenses 1s riled with the aomtaiaaionera’ court, if said olalm la in order, said court hea the legal authorltp to approve, allov and order aaid cleim to be paid. Yours very truly AITCRRRY O- OF TRXhS Ardell Wllliem Assistant AUrdb