Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE A-lTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN f.c’., Q-c.- -- Honorable F. L. &male County Auditor Vernon, Texae Dear Sirs In y3ur lette 940, you w OS@ 8r County a8 first d parties, and re- the Comlsslonera~ rity to make this nsatlon t3 be paid to Prltohard pro rated end gald out of the *a inoludlng rinklng funds or whet &nsation ehould be part aa followsr 5U Part agree* to d owner8 of all pro- 66 wherever situated County, Texae, and un- eats adjacent said con- rtioulnr in- oond Party further agreea to secure rty all information pooaeible and available lloz the we of the First Party, sit ting a@ a Board ol Equalization, in determining the proper valuations to be fixed upon auoh properties Sor assessment and taxation purposes, and generally tc oo~pile euoh informtipn a8 ehall bs of aid and benefit to said lirst Party c 511 Honoreble F. L. Mario, Page 2 in equalizing tho value oS suoh pmpertI& for taxation. *Id party of the Second Part agrees to meet with the Comniselonera’ Court ot Wllbarger County, sittIn& es a Board of XqualitatJon, end to furnish enld Board with all the lnformetlon secured by then during their Investigations Sor the ?arpoae or squal.ixIng the asretssaents upon such proper- tl48. Said Party of the Second Part alao obligate8 Iteelr to n&m a surtey of all pipe 11x148, gas liner and ly6t8ms, refineries, ga8ollw plants, tank fara8, tankage, ltos- ate, oarbon bleok plant&, 8upp4 hou888, and all other properties OS value ueed.in oonneo- tion with said oil and ga8 developirient,inolud- Ing transportation taoI'lItIe8 and inoluding ?ublio utility properties, exae?t telephone 8y8t4lM and railroadr. =a. For and in oonslderatlon of the 8killed aarvio48, teohnlO81 knowledge and experisnoe oi Seoond Party in tbs performance oi the obligations derolving npon'thez here- under, First Party agree8 and obligates lt- self to oozpensate Seoond Party in the manner following: Said Seoond Party @hall reoeivr an amount to be paid out of the Csneral Tund or pinoral fund and other fund8 of Wllbarger County, equal to fcur (41 oentr on each one hundred (100) dollar valuation ooverin3 all oil propeHS40 or other mineral intereat, nnd .publiO utility prOpertie as84884d for the year 1940, except telephone Bystem and railroad. '*Oil Propertlee* a8 herein used, la understood to include oil, gas, sulphur deposits, storage , g&her& lines and syst4m8, refinerie8 , ,;98Oline >bIXt8, tanhi, and tank ferms, tankage, 8torege 011, car- bon blaok plants, eu;7-,lyhouses, CrlllIng rigs, derricks, oil end gas leafiea, royal- ty interests in land, developed and undevel- OPs4, and all other property oi whatever oheraoter or value used In oonneotlon with oil and ga8 developmmt, inoludlng tranepor- tatlon illOilitt48.' lionorable F, L. Massle, Pal:8 3 A var lisllar co&r:& was involved in the oase O? Roper ~8. Hail 200 S. W. 289 before the Waoo Court of Clril Appeals. Tie validity of Luoh oontraot was swtaln- ed, the oourt saying thatr 'The making of the oontraot under oonsidera- tldn was within the implied power posoeaaed by the Comml8810116r8~ Court oi ~r4aston4 County." In the onse of Ear uort vs. Karris County, 117 S. Yi. (2dj 494 at page 502, 4 t was said by the Galveston Court of Cl& Ap eals that a Commiooloner8~ Court map validly amgloy 8R lied expert8 tc velu4 for taXatlOn pArposea ropert in 8peolal lnstano4o v&are teohnlcal equipment P s raqa f red. In the Roper ~6. Rail case, supra, the oontraot rovlded that the oozipensatlon to be paid by yreost~ne 8 ounty to the expert s.bould be paid out of the general fund OS that oounty. 64 rely tiTS*ly on that Ca84 in ansv:erxng that the Commi6‘81onera ( Court had the authority to make the oontraot in question. It is our further 0 lnlon that the whole of the oompensatlon to be paid to Seo:.:n B Parties zust oome from the eneral fund, and that no part thereof may be ta: