Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Xonorablr Andrew Patton Dlrtriot Attorney Dallar County Dallas, Tex.rr ottary rtatutrr pt o? your raquert ctor I. Q.” rrdlo work oaoh work I# our appreolatlon r0r ml your brief which ooaply 6399, Ravirod Clril Stat- 09 th8 brhr rubalttrdr eraa 18 prsasntrd weak ror a half hour mmroial rponror. Thr pro- mm a motion plcturr an intsrd8alon bstaaaa plo- phono hr mlvlner tho red10 and pioture rhori sudienor that ho ha8 rav8ral asmlr- tant8, raoh with a portable microphoar, aaong thr aaabarm of ths audionor. Thr Honorobls Andrrw Patton, pagr 2 announoar reqursts ona of his aseIstants to ohoose a momber of the and irnor who is wIllIng to answar a question sbout to br propounded. Thr announoar than pro- pounds the q ues tioln, :vIsI~ the Farson ohosw that If he oan answsr thr question hs will br paid a stated stim of nonry. In the OVOBt tho correct OB8W.r ir &iV@B, ths monry Is tbsrr paid to tha mombrr.or tha audlrnoa who thus assisted In the vmrk, and thr asslrrtant announcaT8 peas on through the audlrnor ohooslng othar got:; with whom tha proaass Is rrpeatrtl. emnt that ths parson chosen oannot andwar thr question, or glvrs the wrong answar, thr asslstant announoIr, nrvarthalrss, ooopan- satre him for his efforts by presenting him with 6 box of acrohandlsa on behalf or the sponsor of tho program, “As an Illustration oi the questions aotuslly propounds&, soaa that have brsn used arm: nlzbo won thr 1939 National League pennant?’ WgIs It poealbla to make fresh wator out of salt water?’ “‘In 19lf,, In what nation was thr olty OS Wsrsaw?* wFor the oorreot answer to thr first quastion, $9.00 ms p&Id: for the sroond uastlon $5.00; an4 for ths third quertlon %8.00. In tha avant th:t any on8 of ths questiona was not answerrd correctly, tha sponeorr gsta the person who bad voluntrcrrd to trr to answrr the question a box of mer- ohandls a. Therr ir BO Oontrst b&wean the various menbars of the SUdIsBO6, 8imr if tha first person chosen do68 not prO94rly answsr the quartion, ths annoUnoar on thr eta&o advises all of t&r ludianor what tha oorrsot amwcr Is, and an rntiralf blrrer- ent qutstion IS presantrd to the nart par- Honorable Andrew Patton, poet 3 son who volunteers. The mnbera of the audIen who volunteer to try to answer tho qurstlons propounded, rcaeln at their plaoes In tho thsatre and &peak through a portable mlorophone. “?I0 maaber of the audlanoo 18 oom- pellet5 or ureed to pertloipata, but an7 member of the audlenoe who wishes to do so mar havs an opportunity to try to answer a QUeZItiOB. *In afldltlon to that portion of the program hereinabove outlined, awards are m&e by those who present the show to For- sells who rend In questIons that ara ohvam for propoutilng i and other awards ara nade to those mezibers of the audionot who can oorrectlf answer a list of questIons whioh the announcer stater. Eaah member Of the audionor has a tally oar6 upon Hhloh ha MI cheek as right or wrong each rtate~ont included In this list. Usually, th6re are niar or tan such statomante, such as: ‘A latohet Is a shoostrIng. * Zvarjr member of the azlenoe has an equal opportunity to answer th e puostlona, an6 laoh of those who oorreotly answer 811 of the puestlons Is peld an equal srmunt for his contribution Of his talmt to the cvenl~e'e entertaln- aent. There Is no drawing, no ‘luoky BUa- born, nor price, to be droI4ed by lot, luok or chance. Instaad, each person who p3rtlcipetes Is paid for tls partlolpatlon In Qlreot proportion to the value 0s his servlors. - t3ootion 17 0s Artlole III or the Constitution or Texas reads: “The Legislature shall pass laws prohibiting the rstablishment Of lot- teries and girt anterprIses In thls state, es well as the sale of tickets In lotteries, gift enterprises or othsr ava6Iona Involving the lottery prinol- pal, establlehed or exIstlng, in other etatos.m Honorable Andrew Patton, pa(3e 4 FUrWant to 6uOh command the LsgIslature pasasd Artlols 634 of the Fens1 Code, whioh reads 48 r0iim8r *If any parson shall estsblIah a lottart or dIsposa 0s any estate, real or personal, by lottery, ha shall be flnad not lese than One Hundred ($100) Doll4r8 nor more than One ThouBand ($1,000) Dollars; or If sny parson shall mall, offer for sale or keep for sala snr tIokets or part tIoketr in sky lottery he shell be fined not less than TOB t 10) Dollars nor more than Fifty (850 ! Dollare.” in City or Kink v6. crirrith A!nunure~eBt coin- pan7, 100 9. K. (26) 695, (Ter. Sup. Ct.), the oourt said: "The State Penal Code does not da- fin0 8 lottsrr, but our oourts have interpreted it in aocordanoe with pub- 110 usage, to mean 8 schsme or plan xhioh pro~Iaes for a dIstrlbutlon of crItes bf or¬ among those who have paid, Or agreed to pay, a oOn1idaratioB for the right to pertlolpate theraon. 28 Tax. Jur. p. 409, 880. 2, and oases olted in the Betas.* Tha Federal Ciroult Court of Ap eala in the oase of Paek vs. United States, 61 F. (2d 7 973. ha8 given the r0ii0wi~ dafInItIon 0s a lottery: *A schema for tha dIatrIbutIon 0s prizes or thInp,s of value by lot or ohanoe among persons who hsve paid or agree to pay a valuable oonsIder~tion for the ohanca to obtain a prize. And again: A sohwne by ?&Ioh I raeult Is reaohsd by some aotlon or means takan, iB whloh re- sult man’s oholce or till har no pert, nor can human reason, . . . sagacity or design ensble him to know or detsrmIne . . . until the same has barn aoacrnplished.W Eonorabla Andrew bttOB , ps~a 5 Vndtr your statamant Of the fact8 48 quoted by us, two of the elements of a lottery are clearly dlsaernlbla, 1. a., a prlra In money or thing or vslua, end papsat 0s a ooBr.ideration for tb ohanoa to partlolpats In the pro&yam through attendance et the theatra, paying SB admIssIoB price therefor. ?:hether the llament of chance Is 8uffIoItntly est4b- lIshed Is a more perplexing problem , In the 0080 0s Boatwright v. state, ii8 Tex. Cr. R. 381, 3e 8. w. (24) 87, the Court or Criminal Appeals held that a punoh board wherein were pleoad different checker problems, the earns to be oom- pleted by the. pertlclpent efter paying a Set for the prIvIlege of playlw, did not constitute a lottery, even though prlzes were awarded those working out the best solution. We quota from the oplnlorrr *An;7 sohame for the di8trIbUtIOB ~of prizes by ohanoa, under our etatuta, Is a 1otterJ. paaen v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 173, 246 5. F. pl,; Stawer v. State, 107 Tex. Cr. R. 574, 298 S. K. 906. The phrase ‘earns of oh4Bca’ Is defInad In 27 Corpus Jurls at page 968, as SollOws: *It Is a earns detrrmInad entirely or In psrt by lot or mere luck, and In which judgment, praotlce, skill or adroitness have honestly no orrioe et all, or are thwertad by ohanoe; a gas8 In ahloh haaard entirely predomInatss. @ %Ithout approving In Its entirety the foregoing dafInItIon when oonsIdared In oonneotlon with our statute denounolng lotteries, It Is observed that the success of the player In the earna under considera- tion dapends upon praotlca, lr p er Ia n0e, or skill, Other than the ordinary ohenoa or oontInC.cnor which is Involved iB prac- tically every humen endeavor, the element or chance Is not prdent, Tha prize Is drawn ae a rerrard for the skill of the 91 awl and not br ohrnoe. The prsdomlnant llaaent In the game Is one of skill. . .I . iwo Eonorablr Androw Patton, psgr 6 SOI also MoFsr i. Statr, 46 Tax. Cr. R. 489, 81 9. 1. 741; Roit v,. Dally Craphlo, 230 H. Y. s. 360, 103 A. L. R. 870. Fros a oarrful study 0r tbr 6rolrlonr aa lqlied to thr faOt8 prsaantrd by you, we oorxludr that the m6lo program doer not rlolatr thr lottery law oi thlr Stat@. Trutatlng that we ham aetlsfaOtOrl1~ anewerd your lquiry, we are, Yours v6ry truly A Anslrtant