Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Hon. Charles E. %a-, Pa&t?2 .?%oesthe Cctissloner have authority to ;~kz n lmnediatesettlementat the hands of the Thim, In event of refusal to III&~settle- ment, and after Certiiioateof Inspeationhas been revoke%, and the dealer sends out nursery stooks,would he be sub&at to prosecutionunder the provlslonsoi Artlole UOS, Penal Co& of Texas?" (parenthetloalinsertionsours) Artiole 119, Revised Civil Statates, 1925, reads as follows: "The proteotlonor fruit trees, shrubs, an6 plants Sba~ be under the spp8rvi6ion and control of the coraalsslonor of srglculture. The commls- sioiwr shall prepare and enfoxoe suitable ,mleb and regulationsror the traffla aid ehlpaent of cape janmine, out flowers,and such ,greenhouse and floral ~hlpaeatsas w'require control, and for the lnapeetlonof mrkserIe?J, greenhoties,oroh- ards, farest~trees, and all produots ori&natimg fxom the same, withln the meaning of thls uhapter. He shall enforce the ~rovis~onaof thti chavter and BE& cad enforoeeuoh other rules.amlreRulntiom not lnoonslstentherewith as may be deemed access- orytooarrytheeamintoeffeot. II ebllal8 prOYi&e such rules and~egulatfon6 aoLer& al&, private or publia parks avmues of shade trees, shrubberyand ornsmentabalongthestreeta of oltlw, for aity residences,and oity ~property generally,an will aeaure a proteatlonand Unity from Insect peats and contagiousdlseaees intended to be provided for by this law." (Mts lQQQ;p.%l.II.) (Underscoringours) Micle 126, %evised Ciril Statutes, pr0VideS: 90 asoertalnwhether nursery~stooi%i lnf4iOted wlth diseases er pests, the ConmissIoneraha.lIaause to be made at least onoe enah year, an ezaPfPation of each nursery or other plaoe where mrreesyato@k is exposed for s&e. If swh atoek mo examined la apparentlyfree In all reepeots from eny BontagiOU or 3,nfeatlous disea8e or dsnareroesly injWlou In- Beet pests, the c;omarla6l~n~r~~'srnall iesw to tae owner Hon. Charles E. Bmghmin, Pa@ 3 or pxoprletoror suoh steak a oertiilcatarecit- ierred, It shall be v01d.~ (Undersoorlngoure) Artlole 127, gevlsed Civil Statutes, containsthe romtting prwieions f "~Unurserystock~~n~ignedior shipment, or shipped by freight, expreessor other msans of transportation shall be acooapenLedby a eopyotaald certitiaoteattaahsdto eaohoar, box, bale, bundle or paolage. Vihensuah box, bale, bundle, or paakage, contalna nursery steak to be delivered to mix8 than one person; partner- ship, or oorporation,eaah portion of such mm- sery 6tOOk to be deliveredto such person, m- mershlp or corporation,shall also bear a 60 y of the certl,flcafe of inapeotionissued as prw 4ded 'in the preoedlngartlcle.w Article 129, Revised Civil Statutes, pxovldea for xevocatlonof taxtViaate bythe Oxnulssionerof AgrSadLtoce: *The G3sdssioner may xewke any aertlrhat6 Issued under this ohapter when he f.Zndsthat falne representationshave been made by the mrt~ Eo whom the same was issued. or upon refufsal OS swh party to ao?iIply wlthths law, lnatruotionaor ties ~lven by the Coarmlssloneras authorizedby this chapter.w (Unf¶er6coxlng ours) ~~%lcle 133, Revised Ciyll Statutes, authmlsea the collectionof reasonablelnsp8atlonfees by the comai8atoneZ of iigrlaulture: The Comlssloner shall fix and oolleot rea- aonable fees ror the lnspeatlon herein wovided ?or. of not iess wan two do~ars and rirty aent5 nor more thau fifteen dollars ior eaoh inspeetlon.* ~nderssorlng ours) Article 135, Revised Cltil statutes, 1925, prorideS: Eon. Charles 3. Baughmm, Peg6 4 suah.a.gent Shall have proper oredeutlalsrrom the dealer he represent6or eo-operateewlth; and tailing In that, sny such agent shall be classed as a deder, and subject to such rules as ntaybe adopted tielatlngto them, and shall be amenable to the same peaaltlesfor the riolation of any pro716lon of this law.* Art1018 1693 of the Penal Code of T&a8 reads as SOllOW5l "'Alln1U'EeX'ystOakODfl6ign8d.: ~CQ'6hipmePlt, or shfpped by freight, expxe6s or other mans or tren6portatlonshall be aeoompaaled by a copy of said cextlilaate attaohedto eaoh oar box, bale, bantileor package. When such box, bafe, bundle or paakage arntainsnursery 8tock to be dellvexedto more them one pemon, partnershfpor dorporatlon, each portion of m8h nursery steak to be so delis- ered shall also bear a WDYOS.sueheemtlficateof Rev%8wlng the nost p8I.-t%nent oi the above quoted statutes hrtlale l26 requiresthe Conuulesloner Oil'Agrloul- tat8 to issueto the owuer or $roprletor of nursery st#k a certlfioateor lnspeotlonwhere em examination,to be aade at least once a year, dl6elOS8Ssaah stook to b8 ire6 frog disease and lnseot pests. Artiale 3.27stipulatesthat a oopy 0r the 00dri- oat8 of Inspectionaooompany all shipments or nursery etoek. ~tiole 1693 or the mxml Code makes it a penal orfense to Ship nursery stock wlthout the aertiiioate. Artlole 129 provides ~ferre~aatlon of the 8ertlfi- aate on certain conditions, lnclndfngrefta6aXal the Party to whom It waS iesned *to comply tit&the Ia+. Xoc. Charles E. ??augbmn, Page 5 Artfole 133 authorizesthe CcmmlseLonerto *Six and collect reasonable fctm* for tke lnspcetlon,said fcee re&ngfromTWo Dollars anaLrirtycsnts tofirteen Dollars. Tixmi ia no provision In the 'tarloufi artiolcs abow quoted as to the time and mtnnem of payment of the fees for the lnspeotion. Sin00 the ocrtlflcate~oovlded Sor In lirticlcl26, ""P'",iis ncoessary for the nhlpacnt of nursery s,tock, it has oert n.oS the che.racterIstice o? a permit, or a lloensc which has been deiined as a Sorm oS pen&elon.Srom the tapr;oPcr authorltieeto periorm ocrtcln aots end ocrry on a ocr businass,8nd the law rclatln& to paymmt of.&mnse. Or per- nltiees appcam to be applleablc. 2'7Tcx. Juris.p,iW@i *Ordlnarllythe right to a lioenee dependeupon the payment of a See * + ** 27 %Mr. amf.6. ,892: . "LiacMlag sleaBuTc8qLLwc generallyprrmldc i &: thepaJnsnt0raaornbythe licensee to a&ray the exptm88 of issuing the ll-. ocmc and cram&&q the applieaut or supervfrring~ the business to be oonduetcd. Suoh oharges arc umally denomiactcd ~fccst. A license ice is not a fox, but a prioe 6sxactcd ior the exerolse or a pri- vilege. It la levied unaer.thc polio8 ma.mt the taring powcx',aadthe~cforc differccssentially 57 CoqmcJuris p.Es1: g9!hetlmeaudraanner 0s payment of a liocn88 r88 or tax arc gcimraZly governed by the provisionS OS thi statute or OZdi- naaoe rcquirlngthe 1Ocense or tar, th~.gcnecl.ly bclag payable annu8Uy. Vaymant in advance. ?cy5ent of a license fee map be and generally is rcquirredas a oondf- tion premdent to the issuance of a license and 8ngag.lng in bwa888, ma a 3388~8 *sued betom suoh Payment is mid. Undersomcstatatcsand ordinanoespayment Ln aax?anoCis clcc requtied Or license or oooapation taxes, and where a tax fs 2m- posed monthly, an appliea8ti w&f3ha8 already pweued the business ror eom0 tbitedthout tddne louta 306 ~n.Charles !3aughutau,F~e6 liocnse or paying the tax is not entitled to a lIceme without the payment or tender of baok taxes for the tiiache has engaged in the busi- ness. Under otlmr statutes or oraIn8a8881hou- ever, a license or ocoupctlonfcx Is not payable in aavt3m3or as a oon~tion preaedcnt to engcg- Ing In business,partloularly~uhere the tcx Is ~a~3abg tothe aaaunt0ram~ fyos .n Itwill be noted thatuhcrc the itatutc prmidcs ror the time and msnner 0t paylasntor ices, pitymat 0f the roe in advance Is a gcncwil rule. Ia scxe Ihctaa~~, how- ever, the nature or the tax prevents paymat in aavame, ~-whwc the tax Is graded aooordlng to the amount or an- nual sclca3or Income. 37 Corpus auriS $251.' Wher6 the statutes 0ontai.nno express provIsIon as tc.tImc aud payment or rees suoh as are authctizcdby Art1016X53, Rctiscd Civil Statutcc,.1925,It la acocsocry to isoertainthe Intent 0r the Legislaturefrom ca caalysicr hi the statute8 a8 a whole In regard to the tlmc of pa-t. BamInstloa of the aurscry stock aa itmam3 of a ocrtitiaatcor InspcotIcalnvclvcs a 0crtai.namount of em- The objeot or the tees le to defray the expense. Ez*the lcnguagc of &rtIole lS6, Bc~Ised Civil Statutes, lWZi,Icman&atarytothc cffcatthatthe Ccaml~eionbrof igrioultureIsauc a ocrtIrIcatcto the omwr or proprietor sf nursery etook passing the test still It Is equcllymanda- 'Wy under ArtIole X%3, RcYIsed C&L1 Statutes,lOSEi,for him ;o rix and oollcot reasonable reea.r0r the laqmation. A ~8rtIfIoatc of Incpeotlon Is a ocadItIonprcacdcat to ah%-t linursery steak. To 8hIp 'nurserysteok without It is a rio- atlca or then,eIril and orlmlnal statutes af the Stat0 of Texas. fhenursery 8took omcr Is not entitled to the Inspcctlon8ee iae ofthe ~~tmenf0ragrio~~anathellosPsctromrths .kt8 on a oredlt basis. Suuh a oolrstraatian mwld olromawsnt *he pwpcsc or the kot andenable xursery ctauk ommra and pro- rietim to take advantqc or the ben8rit or the Aot at t&3 Wmce or the #tats. Atticle U9, R8vlsca Citilstatutes,.192s. author- a3 the Com.l~sIaneror Agriculture to wenf43roethe provI- lms or this uhaptcz aud etifnwc suuh ether mlccaaa rcgu- atlanenot InoonsIstcnthcri$wIthas mcy be doearedneccsscry . 307 lion. Charles 2. Raughman, Ba6e 7 to carry ths saze into effect.” Art. 129, R. i. 5. 1925, authorizes the Comml6eioner of AgriCtitUre t0 P3YOke a oertificate “when he finds that false represcntstlons have been made by the party to whom the sane was issued” or “u,non refusal of suah party to comply with the law, instructions or rules given by the Comu&ssioner as authorized by this chapter.” Khlle it is not advisable Sor the Repart,,mnt of A,@- culture to issue the certificate without having first collected the tispeotion Sees, still in those cases where the oertifioate has been issued with the understanding that the aertIfIoate fee be paid, the lan@x@ of Art. 129 is broad enough to authorize revocation on the ground either that the oertitioate holder obtaIned the oertitloate by representing that he wmld rexaft r0r tieme ana not havLng done so or intendl~ to do SO, thereby obtalnlnG same under a false representation. iup3.n non- ay- ment amounts to a refusal of the party to oomply with *t Iic law, instruotlons or rulesn uhloh call for payment. Art. 1693 of the Penal Code oontalns the sI,gnlSIoaht prtiIsion that whoever is %zongrullg In posscsslon or suoh oertIflcate* Is subject to Sine. Xhore the certISicat8 of in- spection has been revoked under Artiole l.29, R. C. S. 1925, by the Cozm.l.saloner on account of rerusal to m&e yment, and the possessor thereof sends out or delivers wit gaIn the state, trees, vines, shrubs, plants, bud8 or cuttlngs, I. 8. t#ursery stock subject to the Act, then such nursery dealer 16 Yb~ong- rully !m possession oS such certificate*’ upon the strength or which he z&es his shlprnents, and is subjeot to prO5eOUtIOn under Art. 1693 of the Penel Code. It is our opinion that the Conmissioner 0r figrloul- ture has the authority to refuse issuanoe of the certljicate or inspection provided for under rrrtiole 126, Revised Civil Statutes 1923, to owners and proprietors of nursery steak un- less the inspection fees provided for under Artiole 133 be paid at the time or lssuanoe* that where the certlfionte OS inspection has been issued w&hout aymnt therefoar#, the corn- missj.oner has authority to require f mediate settlemmt Of the inspection Sees from the dealer- and furthermore, that In QBses where the certlfloate has been issued the ConmLssio~s~ has the authority under titicle 129, Revised &lril statutes to revoke any cortiSioate for whloh the owner or proprietor OS nurSerJr stock has persistently delayed or retused to pay; ahd SInalU, where the party to whom the oertifioate OS Inspection has been issued refuses to pay~the +ospeotIon fees thereior ana oontin- ues to send out nursery stoukz under the authority OS said Bon. Charles E. Bau@nWl, Fage 8 certifioatedf Inspection,he is subject to proseoutlonand fine under Article 1693, Penal Code of Texas, for operatirrg under a certificateof Inspeotionwrolyiully in his posses- slon. Trusting that we hare fully answered your in&r- 188, we are Yours very truly ATTORNEYGENl?XUL OP TEXAS