FILED
Feb 02 2018, 6:03 am
CLERK
Indiana Supreme Court
Court of Appeals
and Tax Court
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS
Curtis T. Hill, Jr.
Attorney General of Indiana
Andrea E. Rahman
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
State of Indiana and the Indiana February 2, 2018
Bureau of Motor Vehicles, Court of Appeals Case No.
Appellants-Respondents, 01A02-1709-MI-2049
Appeal from the Adams Superior
v. Court
The Honorable Patrick R. Miller,
Daniel Reinhart, Judge
Appellee-Petitioner Trial Court Cause No.
01D01-1703-MI-12
Baker, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 01A02-1709-MI-2049 | February 2, 2018 Page 1 of 4
[1] The State of Indiana and the Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV)
(collectively, the State) appeal the trial court’s order granting Daniel Reinhart’s
petition for special driving privileges after his privileges had been suspended for
life by a trial court in a different county. We reverse and remand with
instructions.
[2] In April 2012, Reinhart’s driving privileges were suspended by an Adams
County trial court for ten years for being an habitual traffic violator (HTV). In
September 2015, Reinhart’s driving privileges were suspended for another ten
years by an Adams County trial court for being an HTV. Also in September
2015, Reinhart’s driving privileges were suspended for life by Noble County
after he was convicted of Level 6 felony driving when his driving privileges
were validly suspended.
[3] On March 23, 2017, Reinhart filed a petition in Adams County for specialized
driving privileges with regard to all three suspensions. On May 9, 2017,
following a factfinding hearing, the trial court granted Reinhart’s petition. The
same day, the State filed a motion to correct error, arguing that the Adams
County trial court did not have jurisdiction to modify a criminal sentence
entered by a Noble County trial court. On August 11, 2017, the trial court
denied the State’s motion to correct error, reasoning as follows:
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 01A02-1709-MI-2049 | February 2, 2018 Page 2 of 4
The Court acknowledges that the Petitioner was convicted in the
Noble Circuit Court[1] of a felony level offense for Operating as a
Habitual Traffic Violator and as a result of that conviction the
Petitioner’s driving privileges were suspended for life. However,
the Court also notes that statutorily, at the time of that
conviction, Indiana State law required a lifetime suspension of
the Offender[’s] driving privileges and that said suspension was
not discretionary. Therefore, this Court believes that the lifetime
suspension of the Petitioner’s driving privileges that arose as a
result of his conviction in the Noble Circuit Court was an
administrative suspension imposed by the [BMV] and not as a
result of any order issued by [the Noble Superior Court]. Thus
this Court is the proper court of jurisdiction to address the
Petitioner’s request for Specialized Driving Privileges and not the
Noble [Superior] Court.
Appellants’ App. Vol. II p. 11. The State now appeals.
[4] We apply a de novo standard of review to issues regarding jurisdiction and
statutory interpretation. E.g., Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Watson, 70 N.E.3d
380, 384 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).
[5] Indiana Code chapter 9-30-16 grants trial courts the authority to issue
specialized driving privileges to someone whose driving privileges have been
suspended. Indiana Code section 9-30-16-3 allows an individual to file a
petition for specialized driving privileges when those privileges were suspended
by court order by filing the petition with the court that imposed the suspension.
1
The order was entered by the Noble Superior Court, not the Noble Circuit Court. Appellants’ App. Vol. II
p. 32.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 01A02-1709-MI-2049 | February 2, 2018 Page 3 of 4
But if the driving privileges were administratively—as opposed to judicially—
suspended, the petitioner must file the petition for specialized driving privileges
in the county in which he resides. I.C. § 9-30-16-4.
[6] Here, Reinhart’s driving privileges were suspended for life by a Noble County
trial court’s order. He was convicted of a Level 6 felony, and the sentencing
order following that conviction states that his driving privileges were suspended
for life. Appellants’ App. Vol. II p. 32. The fact that the Noble County court
was required to suspend his privileges for life does not transform the
suspension, which was part of a criminal sentencing order, into an
administrative suspension. The trial court erroneously concluded otherwise.
[7] For Reinhart to obtain specialized driving privileges related to the Noble
County order, he was required to file that petition in Noble County. I.C. § 9-
30-16-3. The Adams County trial court did not have jurisdiction to modify the
Noble County order. E.g., State v. Downey, 14 N.E.3d 812, 815 (Ind. Ct. App.
2014) (noting that it is inherent in Indiana’s judicial hierarchy that one court
cannot modify or change the record of another court of equal jurisdiction).
Therefore, we reverse and remand.
[8] The judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded with instructions that
the trial court vacate the portion of its order related to Reinhart’s Noble County
suspension.
Riley, J., and Brown, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 01A02-1709-MI-2049 | February 2, 2018 Page 4 of 4