Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

EAYTOIRNEY GENERAL OF EXAS Honorable A. $. Sutton County Auditor Anderson County Palestine, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. 0*4601 Rer &Yfeot of zibsndonment or non-use on ti.tle to land constituting a oharitable trust. We have oonsldered the questions oontalnsd in our letter of May 18, 1942, addressed to the Attorney @enera 9 and reading as f 0110~s ; “On Jan. 26, 1881 5. W. Wallace et ux et al exeouted a deed, the material part of’ whioh reads as followar "'!Phat we, ci. W. Wallaoe and hie wife, M. J. Wallaoe, and W. B. Watson; for and in oonelderatlon of one dollar to us paid and the fuurther oonaiderat5on ol’ a desire to promote the oause of Bauoation have this day granted and sold and by these preasnts do grant sell and oonvey unto J, HI Barton Jama A, Quiok and U. W. LUnafoPa, Trua6rra for bhr &ok Sohool ~oi-tamunlby In Andrroon Oount and thrir auaooaaora fozwrr for thr uoa and brnrllb o iK the aohool and ohuroh purpoara thr followln drrorlbod land aibuabrd in Andrrron Oounby, Texas, a %out la nrllea north of PalrrbSnr, toni A part of tihr Norbh Xali of 0, Oroor Loagui IIf Be inning at 8, ID, oornrr of Lot Nor 6 of bhr aub- dlvla ! on of arid north half and running North with l&r dlvldin Lot Nor 0 and Lot No. 4 780 va a a rtonr lOP oomem ! ram whloh a rrd oak 6 ln mkd X brr 8 1st W 7 9/6 VY Hlokory 18 in mkd X bra N a0 deg. PI 1st VI Thenor oroaa rpring branoh a0 v r5ghb of I Ing 160 for oor from whloh a blook jaok 6 In r brr N va and Porrt Oak 10 In n&d X bm S 56* W 8 VI Thrnoe Worth lb0 VI Stakr for oomor from whhoh port oak 0 In in dla bra S 40 deg. W 0 l/4 VI a Hlokory 0 ti mkd x bra N 68 deg. W 9 VI Thpnoe South wlth rald Qulok@r weat Lm 160 v6 to the plaos of Irt oorner of this plot oontaln%ng 4 aorea of land to have and to hold the aam ..- Hon. A. E. Sutton - Page 2-o-4601 unto said school Trustees for school and church Purposes forever; We hereby convey and quit claim forever said lands and use and implements to said Trustees and their successors for the uses and purposes aforesaid.” “Many Years later the Elmtown Common School Distriot and the Conoord Common Sohool Distriot were organized. The Concord School District inoluaed the territory described hereinabove. The sohool house located and situated on the above desoribed property was moved into the Elmtown School Distriot and was later sold. There has not been a house on the above desoribed tract of land, nor has it been used for sohool or ohuroh purposes sinoe the removal of the building mentioned above. Assuming that G. W. Wallaoe et ux et al owned the fee simple title to the traot of land described in the above deed, and that there has not been a oonveyanoe of any kind or oharaoter since the date of the above described deed, which distrlot, if either, owns said land? “I shall appreoiate your opinion on the above question at your earliest oonvenienoe.~~ In our opinion, the deed mentioned’oreated a oharitable trust for school and ohuroh purposes in favor of the residents of the Quick Sohool Community in Anderson County, Texas. Charities are highly favored in law and it is an elemental rUle that a court of ohmoery will not allow a trust to fail for want of a trustee. 9 Tex. Jur. 55,56. “In the event that the person appointed trustee refuses to acoept the offioe, or resi after aooeptanoe, or beoause mentally inoompetent, or d rl”” es) or is removed, the court has the power to appoint another Person to act in his stead.” 42 Tex. Jur. 625. If it appears that the maintenance of the pro erty for sohool and ohurah purposes for the Quiok Sohool Comm% itg in Anderson County has beoome impraotioable, the Diatriot Court may, in a proper proceeding brought for that pur 080, order the property decreed out of the trustees named in t Re deed or their successors and vest It in the Conoord Common Sohool Distriot whioh now inoludes the Quiok Sohool Community, or the oourt might, depending on the facts, order the property sold and the prooeeds applied as nearly as may be to the oharitable purposes named in the deed. Inglish v, Johnson, 96 S. W. 558, Error Refused, The answer to your inquir is that the title to the *o arty is in the trustees J. H. g arton, James A. Qulok and 6. #, Lunsford or their suoaes80rsr Hon. A. E. Sutton - Page 3 O-4601 Yours very truly ATTORNEYGENERALOF TEXAS s/ Fagan Dickson BY Fagan Diokiori Asskitant FD:BT/cg APPROVEDJ7XJE11, 1942 8/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEYGEZWXALOF TEXAS APPROVEDOPINION COMXITTEE ByBWB, Chairman