Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honorable B. F. HcKee Gounty Auditor Hldalgo Golmtg Bclinburg ) Texas Dear Sirr inion of thlr depart- ment on the above a an received. ccording to the last fwd- Aooordln8 to the opulation of Hidalgo Coun- "Pleaew advlae if there Se any mthor- ity in law for paying the Oounty COB&S- I ' aionera of Bid&o Count7 the $50.00 per month spaoFfled in the above mentioned act." House Bill Ho. 848, Chapter 194, Page 492, Acta of the Forty-fifthLegietature,1937, Rsgulsr Swa6ian, made in part as folloPst Eonoreble B. F. Xoitww,Page 2 "Section 1. In any oounty In thla State having a population of not less than seventeen thousand, six hundred (17,600) end not more thau seventeen thousand, swvwn hundred (17,700) and in auy oounty in this State having a popu- lation of not less than seventy-seventhousand (77,000) and not more than sevwnty-seven'thou- aand, one hundred (77,100) and lu any aouuty in this Stete having 8 population of not less thau seventy-seventhousand, five hundred (77,500)and not more than seventy-seventhou- mud, six hundred (77,600).secordlhg to the lost preceding Federal Census, the Dosanlsrionwrs Court 1s hereby authorlawd to al ow each Oomls- aloner the sum of Fifty Dollars t450) per month for traveling expenses and deprealstlonon his automobilevhlle 'onofflalal business. Each rush Oosusirslonerrhell pay all expenses ln the operation of saoh automobileand keep saam In ~~palr free of my 0th~~ oharge to the couu- tY. “* l 4 -n Thla department has heretofore ruIed on House Bill Ilo.848, supra, es it applies to Owamron County, holding that the e&me Is a special lav regulatingthe affairs of Cameron Gaunt?, s.udtherefore uuoonstitutionslcud void. A copy of this oplulon, vhlch Is So. O-2811, le enclowedherevlth for your luformatlon. What Val thereewAGdwith reference to the aonstltutlounlltyof Eouaw Blll'lo. 848, supra, aa it applied to Cameron County Is equal appllaable to aald Act ~8 it applied to Xldalgo County. A 8lmllar~A~twas held uaconetltutionalin our Opinion fo. O-1955. It will also be noted that Iudalgo County has a pogu- ., lstlon of 106,059 lnhabltantsacooFdlng to the 1940 Federal ut of the ~~~~a~o~sb,"B$iiS!iiS~;$ %%Xs~h~~3ilWh84~, supra. pllmblw to Hmslgo 0oullty. After a oareful search of the stat- utes, ve have been unable to find any statute authorlr the above mentioned expenditure for couutlea having the po2 atlou of BldaLgo County as lndlcatedby the 1940 Federal census. In view of the foregoing,we respectfullyanswer the #@orable b. F. &See, Page 3 above stated question ln the negative. Trusting that the foregoing fully anliversyour in- quiry, we are YouPa vary truly ATTOXXHY OltXEXALOF TEXAS m wlJ* Ardell Williams Asslatant Am&S