Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE AmORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honorable Xelrin Combs COule~ AtAoraq Jer~r80n count7 Beaumont, axu A Dou air1 .oplnlcnlo. O-30 R.1 aalar + @P 7tu UU Ox -8 o f Jo i lr Do a a o unty . 7!t Your requert carefully oonaldrrsd br thlr your requert u follov8: "5. In coiitiea having .a population of one hundred thousand and one ‘(100,001) a~ld zlot ZC:E thar oz~e h.xiZred and fifty thoueand (l’jO,OOO) lnhabitantr, firat assirtant or chief BonorrbleNelvin Coabr, ?age 2 deputy not to la eed Tventy-rix Eundred (~2600.00) Dollar8 per annum~ herd8 of de- p.wtmentr may be aloved by the Co8m18810ner81 Court, vhen In their judgment ruoh allovanoe 18 juottlled,the 8um of Tvo Hundred ($200.00) Dollar8 per annum in addition to the amount herein Gloved, vhen ruoh he& of depart- ment8 rota&t to be rppolnted rhsll have me- riowl~ rewed th8 oountr or pollt~.oalrub- ~dlvl8lon thereof for not lerr than tvo oon- %lnuow rearmj other l r r lr tmnt~ , deputier or olerkr no% to loeed Tventy~three liundred (~2300.00) Dollar8 per annum laoh." The main problem prorented by the quertlon rubmlttcd 18 vhether the word8 "rhall hare prevlou8ly rerved the oounty or pollbltal rubdlvlrlon thereof ior not lerr than tvo con- tlnuour yeara" lhould be oonstruedto tieantvo oontlnuouryearm next preoediq the ~ppolntunt, or m tvo oontixkuou8 year8 sedlng the appointment. Where the 8tatutory language 18 uablguoum or.admlta of~more t&m one mimning, It la to be taken In ruoh ti 8epIe a8 vi11 oo&iformto the lo o p e and intent of the A&, and vi11 beet or rort eertalnly laoompllmh It8 purpole vlthout do- violence to plain rtrtutory language. A oonrtruotlon that vlll unduly limit it8 plain purpome, ~111 be &voidedIf po88ible. 39 Ter. hr. pp. 218-219. In permitting the payment of a larger 8alarf to the head of a department rho 'rhall have prevlourlj rerved the oounty or polltloal rubdlvlrlon thereof for not 1088 than tvo contlnuour year8 , ” ve believe the bglrlature intended that a head of a deparwt with prevlour experience in oounty mattera rhould be entitled to a larger 8alary than an inexperienced person. By requiring the prevloua aervioe to be “not leas than tvo continuous yearr” ve bellwve the Iaglrlsture Intended to set a minimum length of experience required to qualify an appoLntee to the additional salary, and to eliminate those persms vhose previous service totaled tv3 years blz:t VZS were . - Sonorablellelv%nCorbm, F8gm 3 employed ._ . .only . periodically. --. - ._ It 18, a matter of oommon ._ knkwledge - - tnat 0ertu.n orrioerm or tne county governmnt, partruuariy the tax l 88e88or-oolleotor, require extra help during oertain rumh p8riOdD. To oonrtrue the vordr in quertlon am reanlng tvo ooAtl.Auouayearm the bppolntment vould be plrolng a~ Undue limitat purpore o? -the rtatute. 8uoh a oon8truotloA~vould llialtnitesum7 able 8en rith mny year8 o?~ oontlnuow rerrloe . 8uoh a oonrtruotlon vould alma prerent a rerlour quertlon am to the le h of time that UL offloer taking offloe on Sa~uary 1 1941, ootF d valt before appointing the head8 o? the 8eTerd departmEnta withouthaving the tvo OOA- tiAUOU8 p-8 AeXt preOedi~ the ~ppOb¶tmeAt interrupted Dui- fieientlf to make ruoh propored appointee8 ineligible to qualify for the additional salary. It vould tend to penallre the of- fleer vho moat oarefulry and dellberately~attempted to appoint the beat qwlifimd per8on8. We oannot apee that thm purpore of the rtatute IA quertlan ju8tlfler rush a lirlted oenrtruotlon, It 18 our Opinion, therefore, that the VOrdD "Dhrll have prerlourly rerved the OouAtJ or politioal 8ubdi~i8ioA there- Of ?Ol! AOt le~88 t&M tV0 OOllti.!NlOUD ~e~8,’ in 8OOtiOA 5 O? k- tiele 3902, mupra, rhotid be eonrtruod am meuii.ngx tvo eon- tlnuow~m preeed.bg the appointrent. You are, thereform, rempeotf~l~ 8dvLred that it ia the oplnlo~ of thlr department, under the futr rtated, that thm 88lm7 of the ohle? deputy cannot legally th8 mum of lx o eed ~2600.00 and that the malu7 of the other doputr, haad of the autaaoblletax department,cannot legallylxoeed the rum of $2500.00 per uinu8. Your8 very truly ATTORHEY GElfERALOF TEXAS BY Edgar Pfeil Assistant EP:RS APPROVED MAR 19, 1941 This Opinion Conridered and /a/ Oerald C. &DA Approved in Llmlted Con?erenoe ATTOREEY 0ElGM.L OF TEXAS