Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

406 OFFICE OF THE AHORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 0 of rtghtplant by HI s, ken of WBt Team*utslitie8 atn&ixpeotto illstanit in It ir ale0 my ~erstim&Sng net k*prerent 8nr profit ewoatbsecuma eowtitor in lusb bueincaer Th* log&$ of enoh wastsudion in oral2lllwtrmul by the etla(l oi 3wtton ** AmerlaanlhmeLira Ixmlmwo Go,, ms 8. f. 893 Pt. Earth Cl+. Appt. tit refussd,*herob it riraa oodtandsll bet rr6l.r ef 5saoW ot one lpearanee oompanyto another vlolatedl the aatl-tmut ana antl4aenopoly st8tutm (sewartidliw 7486 wa 7489,'R,..Q. 8. 1985). After referringto theaq etatntee, the &.wt raittt HanorabloWa2tu Xunhiaont Page PI "Xf &Whiff balow had 6otorain.d to tlis- SOlYO, it outala2y had the right to de a0 w4.r the law, w of the aala, ttE4.rtha ~lrouastaaoos, it5 9X0 QrtiQ@ OOU~ tWt tOlId 80 PPUOilt OP 1WSOlk eompet1 0'ion." To the a~&~ effoot$6 thi dooi8ionor thenTome 8tipro.iCourtin Oater v. Hoowr, 90 Fez. 863, 39 S. W. 1009 (qaoteUwith approvalin Lamar T. Smith, 196 8. W. 964 at 979) ~uhwdnth~eoqrtB.olandt *XI&twdu to awatitato a trust*ithin the sumnineof the atatut~thuo most be a *oambination of 5a ital. skill,or aotr by twcor morsrt WOW binit4 en* ‘as hue rued, mqans unionor la so o ia tio ~. Xf thmr~ be no onion or @aaoqiatlon .bf %wo or mwa oi the&r *6epitol stillor aotis'then asn be aa 'oomb~tion ,' mui henor no ‘trust’ .. . When wo eonsidu tha pu~posoofor rhiah tha. Qombiaatlon~muat bo f&ma& to bosa within the statute, the eaaantiel mating of the word 'aoabln- ation’ and the fwt tbat a putddmtmt Ls prew~bra. ~‘fo$laoh b y that the $rwt oontln~soin a#iataaoo, '10arm lad .@Ithe aorrolwloon that tho malen QT arao- 5iatioaor ~*.a ita2.aki21 ar aotsg domanood irr . 1 where,the.part Paa In the pwtlotiiaroaw Uoufgt104 the unitadoo-opmation of suah agoaoias,whlah mlgh*"~ve othorriaoboom Wlopotioat and oompetfng, .for,tM asoompliabmo~t oi one or more of saoh par- poso5.* ‘y:. f*~.OreagoP,52 8. w. (U4) 463, the Appw25, in 8u5talalng the va2blfty uabelrtti antbtrwt l8w~ of a oontraatof birro2utioa6f a putnurhip whoroby oao of the ptrtnon R mod to pUrchW0 fop on6 year the garrslinorot a oertainf8ISing statloafrom the other partmrr,6.8elar5di ;. .. ‘. “Xt’mald thu8 appear thet it IS not the mre fact of oumblnetloaS.nitu ortinary~ssoso that Ia do- aounad by the &at&to, .batthe tom InOltrboa dOdRIP on the part of th6 partlosto ogfootuatethe mmom- plisbmmt of one or tire of the prohibited purpoaes~~ c 409 Eenorablo Walter Mudhlsoa,Pa& 4 wnuer the foPogoing wthoPlt1oa 1t la oar optnion thkttbo DrwoaalarlebjiN'r~ Loonto tlm West T~ua~illhioa rortldaotVio%ata tho Mtl-tnut lnwa of Taur~- then being ae demlgnor pta l o a the put of either Pty to FautAOOor 8iOn in th eWl5 of lleotrr0 powr thareby. olimimto oom@atr@ A&ii l.wJB,B. a. s. mis, P5aaa @I)fo22owt aa8oolationtw oorporatloa now tm&irthe Mm of third Sate purpo5*, l.eu*, ~22 or oth5nlaa dimpow of 'it8 tn- the phnt OF buaineaa OF any partthereof, to any other fndividtml,8aaoalatlon or oorporatiaawhieh,'at tb thao~ofraid’sala, lwao o? other &iposltion of 5rSd p2wt orebnslnoaa or any put thuroft b doing,or law lutb a r ity t0UO-a2iIts b tt5lttO isaid lnoorpante6 inea Oity,town or &2ege.. Btothhg ?iuelB ahall aM2xelzo any eor~ttou to -go iD my kind of baeinoarrnet euthorlti by lta &arterP G3m&aala ours) Tha aaderlirud wrda Ln the above it&t&a oloarly in- YouF5 tsry tnily AP~ovmJUN 15, lgf’ ATTORH3YO~OFTRXAS Walter RdCooh