Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

.,-.~~_...-_.-- / OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN >- Ron. *ill crow, April 10, lOSO* ?age 8 a on utio lo r r m8a u r o llmo r _ *Ar t. 84 l.Th8 Clark of 8 hart irpr Whl~U.~ppUllOt8kODdUl~*purU noD a0 praetleahl*, a tralmoript in 4~pll- e& o ,in lu r yu o a & awh ia ahnlp p r ahlo b o en ta k en, wh io D hmllo o nta aiall tha pro- ne&i&a had inthe oaoa aaQ eonfoa totha ruler &oTuJllDg tlmnoerl to in (llvllo&*.8, the copy of uah trAmorPpt to k fihd in thotriril eourtwltbt~ originalpapora in 1.x- the wo and the original to be forwrbd toth* l ierI0of.tho Court of Crld.n&Appml.8 l jmwidod b Artlo& 04S of the @ob of cr&iM1pro80bre ef the matooflbru, loaf?.Provided the Clark &all not *hug8 ' fer the utn 8Opy. -Art. 848. Tho olork &tall prupan trMoorlpt0 in ?*loay use0 that kavs ken lp p ea lo inil p r efenneo to do b zma no u nm r aad 8hd.l prapre tramorlpto in all orb- ha1 oaua appealed lm prefermoo to oirll UU8* .’ , ,-. Hon. will crow, April 19, lB89, Pmge s tbbd~oa~e,~p&ffo~*' the da* aws-nt -0 data tko lppe8.1umo takuq and tho ilark rlull r8ml It to the oluk af th alp p d.lalao r t. *Ar t. 64 6.WhenIt appar8 by tke llerk*m lwtifl8ak t4t mi appeal hm ken tabn bat that tlu tronooript ha0 Dot boon n001Tea by thoirluk ot~tholou+ M~oriminal appeal8 wlthln tho tima ~qulud by law ror illlug transorlptoIn lIvI1 latlon8',8uoh lluk &all IIu6dlatol~ 8etlfy tha rlerk of the propu 00urt that th0 M 40 mot km m00iv0a, M uo h llork rlthort&ela 8hUl puparo mad roruard anothertranoor I: pt ao in tkorirot ~4utanu, a* notie tha olork 0r t&o lpp4mio 'Mart httor or tko tact that ouah truu- 8oriptz l kontwuud~daadbm~whoaIt no rwmrdod.g Arudhgofthgu rho artlolooto&&hor Inbl- atoo that it l.8ru&to~ that the olerk prepuo an4 fm- nr6 tha tUMOrlpt to tho Court of Crldaal Appoal8, ml- thou@ the loot t0r US puparationof the truuorlpt ha0 rot boon pia. Althou6htJmx-a a?. no lp~llato oourt ran8 ln Teuo on the qtmotlon of the lountr olorkohm- ha& vmmo ror a tranooript ia a rlodoauzioraaoo, howwar,’ It wao bid in the laoo, Bdmndaon TO. State, 6 S. w. hd ol*rk oould not deaand J&a rn in lie, that a ~4lotriot lWane* ru prmpu* a tranooriptia a id04 appeal. T h a n lra so prorloloaiIn the otatuko prmlb- ‘lngio r l oath in mlo4anaor pa&t&tar*8 aye an 8ppul. The law 18 wtlowbly rllontan tb queotfona lubmlttod la rota lnquir7ud Upuroro, m&y QLO woulb k in doubt a0 to the lo r r utmuworm . In poslna(lupon l 8iallu lltuatlonin t&a laoo of a%lloy ~8. state, 1S s. w. Ihid706, aad&* Uttirou uaod the iollmda& lmguago~ *0u duirotu of kriagtb'eorroot- 1~88 ef hIo trial uriowd en appeal lh o ull 4~0 th 0 p up t a d td.uh~00ia0~00 g 0r ell off101~10rho ban Iutiga In lomoatltm WithtIM popWuIopOf tbo XWOrdID lUOh Ron. Will Crow,April 19, 1989, ?a#e 4 ~8.; ld, if t&i’. k &oubt aa to the onot &ttItUdo of a4 8t0p III8aOh prepurtloa ior lpmal, m doom It lhould k ~noo1r.d IE of th a looooed. r a r er ma appouuw80000 to tvo l0t.d dth pN&9tnbOO and dil~~oa in trying to mt hi0 rtakprnt of rO0t0 lp- prorod and kforo thlo o&art. WI are un- rU.lsg to oonoodo that ho lho#ild be &prim6 of #ma when tbro lo a doubt a8 to the . toohaIul point DOW nlud CI the itat..- B. think th a thlo t lqw lo lppllublo ln th lolan ud any (Oubt rhoall k reoolrodIn famr or th brendmt. You are rrrpotfully adrimed that it lo the oplaloa or thlo no rtnilt that tha oooto of OouDt~ .oourt eumot bo ooE lokd rutI &adgunt of tho qpoll&o OO& i8 ~08i~d by t& OOMt irOBiWhIehth0 & pOti -0 ld t4 pauper** 04 th ta k en 4 0no lpplIoatIonf)a ~Sodo- manor oauo a8 rar aa aa rppoal 1s lonoomod urd you &o f’a r b hldvlood or that tiw oounty olork oar¬dound aad rompal defaulant to pay looto of bIl1 of lxaoptlons and tmuarlpt before tho um are delirarod to the do- r*ndant. Truoting thnt tho rorogoing auwuo youi Inn- f&w, - r-h very tiu1r pur8 AT’lYJSUf?ZT UEXitRALOf lWU=d) Arddrll WIllla~ Mel1 u1111a0s AooI8tant (Slgnwl) Ouald C. ,jmnn AT?ORXH ==3+w==fJ