J-S60029-19
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
IN THE INTEREST OF: M.G. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
OF PENNSYLVANIA
APPEAL OF: M.G.
No. 1142 MDA 2019
Appeal from the Order Entered June 25, 2019
In the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County
Civil Division at No: 19-2142
BEFORE: SHOGAN, STABILE, and PELLEGRINI,* JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY STABILE, J.: FILED JANUARY 27, 2020
Appellant, M.G., appeals from the June 25, 2019 order directing him to
undergo involuntary inpatient treatment pursuant to § 303 of the Mental
Health Procedures Act (“MPHA”), 51 P.S. § 7303, 1976 P.L. 817, as amended.
We affirm.
The trial court recited the pertinent facts in its Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a)
opinion:
[State Correctional Institution (“SCI”)] Rockview
psychiatrist, Dr. Rashid Chaudry, M.D., testified that Appellant
suffers from Unspecified Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder, and
has not taken his prescribed medication, Zyprexa. Appellant was
referred to the Mental Health Unit at SCI-Rockview after he
attempted to commit suicide while at [SCI] Phoenix. Appellant
has had multiple suicide attempts in the past, and Dr. Chaudry
testified that any future suicide attempts could be more lethal than
the last. At the time of the hearing, personnel at the Mental Health
____________________________________________
* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S60029-19
Unit were still trying to assess Appellant because Appellant denied
he attempted suicide, denied his history of mental illness, and was
not willing to be forthcoming with information regarding his recent
or past suicide attempts. Dr. Chaudry concluded Appellant was a
danger to himself.
Trial Court Opinion, 9/6/19, at 3.
In the suicide attempt at issue, prison authorities found string hanging
from a vent in Appellant’s cell. N.T. Hearing, 6/17/19, at 12. Appellant
testified that he did not intend to attempt to hang himself, and that the string
may have been left there by cell’s prior occupant. Id. at 12-13.
Section 303, as pertinent here, authorizes involuntary emergency
treatment for a person already subject to treatment under § 3021 whenever
the necessary treatment is likely to extend beyond 120 hours. 51 P.S.
§ 7303(a). To impose involuntary treatment under Section 303, the trial court
must find by clear and convincing evidence that the subject is severely
mentally disabled. In re S.B., 777 A.2d 454, 456 (Pa. Super. 2000). Section
301 of the MHPA provides that a person is severely mentally disabled when,
among other things, he is a clear and present danger to himself:
(2) Clear and present danger to himself shall be shown by
establishing that within the past 30 days:
[…]
(ii) the person has attempted suicide and that there is the
reasonable probability of suicide unless adequate treatment is
afforded under this act. For the purposes of this subsection, a clear
and present danger may be demonstrated by the proof that the
____________________________________________
1 51 P.S. § 7302. Appellant does not dispute that he was subject to treatment
under § 7302.
-2-
J-S60029-19
person has made threats to commit suicide and has committed
acts which are in furtherance of the threat to commit suicide[.]
51 P.S. § 7301(b)(2)(ii). On appeal, we must determine whether the record
adequately supports the trial court’s findings. Commonwealth ex rel.
Gibson v. DiGiacinto, 439 A.2d 105, 107 (Pa. 1981).
The record in this case confirms that Appellant has attempted suicide on
multiple occasions, and Dr. Chaudry opined that Appellant was likely to
succeed unless he was treated. Regardless of Appellant’s denials, and his
claim that he was not responsible for the string hanging from the vent in his
cell, the record plainly supports the trial court’s order.
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the applicable law, the record of
the June 7, 2019 hearing, and the trial court’s opinion. We affirm the order
based on the trial court’s well-reasoned opinion. We direct that a copy of that
opinion be filed along with this memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Judgment Entered.
Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary
Date: 01/27/2020
-3-
Circulated 12/30/2019 05:17 PM
.RE�l SEP e S 2019 . •$,
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION - LAW
IN THE INTEREST OF:
M.G. No. 2019-2142
Attorney for Appellant: David Crowley, Esq.
Attorney for Appe!!ee: Daniel McGee, Esq.
Opinion in Response to Matters Complained of on Appeal
Ruest, P.J.
M. G. (Appellant) filed an appeal on July 11, 2019 to a Report of the Mental Health
Hearing Officer and an accompanying Order entered June 20, 2019, and an Order of Court
entered June 25, 2019 denying Appellant's Petition for Review of Certification to lnvoiuntary
Inpatient Mental Health Treatment. Appellant filed a Concise Statement of Matters ComRl�in\�c;l ., ·
� ·\ , .! ·;
t--1 '"11> .( f .: -'.
of on Appeal on July 29, 2019. Upon review of Appellant's Statement, th�f�.ggg H�>e�,I_IY�-� · <,
.: l_-;orri en m .1) '.
maintains that no error was committed. By way of further explanation, the:{iil£re�ec�y::/
submits this Opinion pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a).
:��;:;
>'._2:;-,::..
J.. ��;:; 'I
........ \i'"
'-0-
u
·-J.�1�,- N.. �<,
.-v. 1 ..
:t:-i�
Background o�
:_J-< :;:o .. ,
(SC�ocfview)
The Mental Health Unit at the State Correctional Institution at Rock�ew
filed a Petition for Extended Involuntary Treatment of Appellant on June 14, 2019 pursuant to
section 303 of the Mental Health Procedures Act, 50 P.S. §7101, et seq. A hearing on the
petition was held before Mental Health Hearing Examiner Sonja Napier on June 17, 2019. On
June 18, 2019, Hearing Examiner Napier filed a report granting the petition and involuntary
commitment of Appellant to inpatient treatment at the SCI-Rockview Mental Health Unit for a
period not to exceed twenty (20) days. Appellant filed a Petition for Review of Certification to
Involuntary Inpatient Mental Health Treatment on June 24, 2019. This Court denied Appellant's
Petition on June 25, 2019.
DO ORD l:RIS Appendix "D"
Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 11, 2019 and the Court ordered a concise
statement on July 16, 2019. Appellant filed his concise statement on July 29, 2019.
Discussion
Appellant raises one matter on appeal:
Did the government Jack sufficient evidence to involuntarily commit Appellant to
involuntary psychiatric treatment as it failed to present clear and convincing
evidence of conduct supporting a conclusion that death or serious physical
debilitation or bodily injury were likely imminent if he were not forced into
treatment?
50 P.S. §7303 provides for Court-ordered involuntary treatment not to exceed twenty
days. The statute specifically provides:
(a) ... Application for extended involuntary emergency treatment may be made for
any person who is being treated pursuant to section 302 whenever the facility
determines that the need for emergency treatment is likely to extend beyond 120
hours. The application shall be filed forthwith in the court of common pleas, and
shall state the grounds on which extended emergency treatment is believed to be
necessary.
50 P.S. §7303(a). A person who is severely mentally disabled may be subject to involuntary
emergency examination and treatment when, as a result of his mental illness, that person's
"capacity to exercise self-control, judgment and discretion in the conduct of his affairs and social
relations or to care for hrs own personal needs is so lessened that he poses a clear and present
danger of harm to others or to himself[.)" 50 P.S. 7301 (a). A person poses a clear and present
danger to himself when
(ii) the person has attempted suicide and that there is the reasonable probability
of suicide unless adequate treatment is afforded under this act. For the purposes
of this subsection, a clear and present danger may be demonstrated by the proof
that the person has made threats to commit suicide and has committed acts which
are in furtherance of the threat to commit suicide[.)
50 P.S. §7301 (2)(ii). The government must prove by clear and convincing evidence that a
person is in need of involuntary commitment and treatment beyond 120 hours. In re Hancock,
719 A.2d 1053, 1057 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1998).
2
Appendix "D-111
Upon a Petition for Review of Appellant's involuntary commitment, this Court listened to
the audio of the hearing held June 17, 2019 at SCI-Rockview. At the hearing, SCI-Rockview
psychiatrist, Dr. Rashid Chaudry, M.D., testified that Appellant suffers from Unspecified
Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder, and has not taken his prescribed anfipsychotlc medication,
Zyprexa. Appellant was referred to the Mental Health Unit at SCI-Rockview after he attempted
to commit suicide while at the State Correctional Institution Phoenix. Appellant has had multiple
suicide attempts in the past, and Dr. Chaudry testified that any future suicide attempts could be
more lethal than the last. At the time of the hearing, personnel at the Mental Health Unit were
still trying to assess Appellant because Appellant denied he attempted suicide, denied his
history of mental illness, and was not willing to be forthcoming with information regarding his
recent or past suicide attempts. Dr. Chaudry concluded Appel Jant was a danger to himself. The
Court found Dr. Chaudry's assessment of Appellant demonstrated, by clear and convincing
evidence, Appellant was in a present danger of inflicting harm on himself.
For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully suggests that the Superior Court
should affirm the Order of Court directing Appellant be committed to inpatient treatment at the
Mental Health Unit at SCI-Rockview entered June 20, 2019, and the Order of Court entered
June 25, 2019 denying Appellant's Petition for Review of Certification to Involuntary Inpatient
Mental Health Treatment.
BY THE COURT:
Pamela A. Ruest, President Judge
Date: September 6, 2019
3
Appendix "D-2"